What is the correct response?
#1
Posted 2011-August-31, 18:49
This is my second question on the forum.
Opener bids 1♠
Responder holds: ♠KQxx ♥QJ ♣KJxxxx ♦10
Thanks for the advice.
Rich
#2
Posted 2011-August-31, 19:53
Just my opinion; will let others pronounce what is "correct".
#3
Posted 2011-August-31, 20:00
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#4
Posted 2011-August-31, 21:14
Change the ♥ to Ax or Kx and 4♦ becomes more attractive.
What is baby oil made of?
#5
Posted 2011-August-31, 21:22
ggwhiz, on 2011-August-31, 21:14, said:
I think you must have some different follow-ups to J2N which make that bid attractive in your partnerships. Just an observation. We often bad-mouth someone's choices without understanding the context they are working within.
However, in general, it would seem that the hand which is going to come down in dummy should be the one which is known..as opposed to the opponents knowing more about declarer's hand than they need to; bringing us back to a choice between the suit and the splinter.
This post has been edited by aguahombre: 2011-August-31, 21:30
#6
Posted 2011-August-31, 21:38
aguahombre, on 2011-August-31, 21:22, said:
Very true. We have minimum control agreements for splinters that this doesn't fit.
What do you do after a splinter when pard bids 4 hearts? OK, 4 spades(maybe) pard continues with something..... Seems like we have mapped the defence here too.
We need a clearcut (mandatory) cue and not 1st OR 2nd or we don't splinter. Easy to forget and every time we do it's a bottom.
Interesting hand Rich cause I'm certainly not on firm ground.
What is baby oil made of?
#7
Posted 2011-September-01, 02:01
4D.
If the hand fits your splinter agreement, make the splinter.
Standard agreement set seems to be
#1 at least 4 card support
#2 12-15 HCP
how far away is this from the given hand.
Since we talk about a 4D instead of a 4H splinter, opener has a bid av.
to show / deny SI, which means that the splinter definition can be wider.
........................................................................
An alternative option is to bid a 3D mini splinter.
A minisplinter eiter showes a 8 looser hand or a hand with 6 or less loosers.
I never played mini splinters, but as far as can make it out, minisplinter
are as good / as useless as any other agreement for 3D - of course I am just
talking about the agreements I know.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2011-September-01, 03:58
2NT is not for me unless I have an ultra whizz bang responding system to that and I don't as i do not play 2NT Jacoby.
#9
Posted 2011-September-01, 05:09
#10
Posted 2011-September-01, 10:48
#11
Posted 2011-September-01, 11:00
whereagles, on 2011-September-01, 10:48, said:
I don't understand the reasoning. If you have crud in one rounded suit, and a lengthy trick source in the other, how does that favor splintering rather than bidding the suit you have length in? Just asking.
#12
Posted 2011-September-01, 11:51
As for the problem, I think that 2♣ is the correct bid, simply because we have a potential source of tricks, and we'd like partner to upgrade hands containing club honours, which he will do if we show the suit.
I don't know about SAYC, and don't know what method you are playing, but I intend to bid clubs and then, if partner rebids spades, to splinter in diamonds....which really focuses on his hearts and club fit. If he dosen't rebid 2♠, I will show my spade support cheaply and see what happens (I am assuming that my spade support will be forcing, as it would be were we playing, for example, 2/1 gf).
I don't splinter...I don't like concealing 6 card suits. I certainly don't use J2N, no matter what my response structure is...this doesn't feel like a hand on which to assume captaincy this early.
#13
Posted 2011-September-01, 11:59
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#14
Posted 2011-September-01, 12:09
1) Shows an immediate "minimum" GF raise with at least 4 cards but not a powerhouse ( with a stronger hand I would Jac2NT even with shortness ).
2) A stiff so Opener can evaluate wastage;
3) 8 cards ( maybe 7 ) in the rounded suits with "stuff" in them for the GF raise.
If Partner next cuebids 4♥ ( over 4♦ ), that's all I need to hear -- I'm going 4NT-RKC .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#15
Posted 2011-September-01, 12:24
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2011-September-01, 12:09, said:
4♥ may be last train without a ♥ cue, another reason not to splinter.
#16
Posted 2011-September-01, 13:57
1S - 3D!
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#17
Posted 2011-September-01, 14:52
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2011-September-01, 13:57, said:
1S - 3D!
Huh? First you want to splinter as a prelude to keycard if he squeaks over the splinter, and now you want to merely invite game? I understand that you presumably intend to raise a signoff to game, but don't you think that these views are a tad inconsistent?
#18
Posted 2011-September-01, 15:01
richrf, on 2011-August-31, 18:49, said:
This is my second question on the forum.
Opener bids 1♠
Responder holds: ♠KQxx ♥QJ ♣KJxxxx ♦10
Thanks for the advice.
Rich
Welcome to the forums, great question.
ON going debate does one set trumps and show 4 card support and if so how first or show a possible source of tricks with 2c.
I prefer to show a 4 card raise now. I can live with 2nt(bergen) my first choice or splinter.
#19
Posted 2011-September-01, 15:59
mikeh, on 2011-September-01, 14:52, said:
I was just showing another 4 card raise option.
I'm always leery of the "source of tricks" option ( even though it is GF ) because I can never prove to partner later that I have 4 card support.
Then there is the "interference" factor:
1S - ( p ) - 2C! - ( 3D )
p - ( 5D ) - ??
As noted, 4D! is my first choice.
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#20
Posted 2011-September-01, 19:56
Since club support looks like pretty good news for this had, I'll bid 2♣.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.