How aggressive are you?
#1
Posted 2014-April-06, 18:27
#2
Posted 2014-April-06, 19:13
#3
Posted 2014-April-06, 20:30
P having the heart suit had available a x and conversion to 4h with
a really good hand and they chose not to do that. Since I expect p to
score 7 tricks for their 4h bid if I had a balanced yarb my extras do
not quite add up to enough for a slam try but I have great sympathy for
anyone that makes a move.
#4
Posted 2014-April-07, 05:08
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#5
Posted 2014-April-07, 06:18
PASS
#6
Posted 2014-April-07, 06:33
Too many things things that can go wrong. I pass.
#7
Posted 2014-April-07, 08:03
Fortunately for our result in the tournament, my partner did not pass. He bid 4NT, found me with one key card, and bid 6♥. The two hands:
Everything behaved, and 6♥ rolled (By the way, no coughing was involved - and, if it were, how do you show 2 singletons?).
Just goes to show that sometimes you have to do the wrong thing at the right time.
As I mentioned above, this hand was played against one of the better pairs in the event. This was the second board of the round (fourth of the event). On the preceding board, my partner opened 3♣ at favorable vul. My RHO bid 3♠, and my LHO, with a huge hand, key carded and settled for 6♠. Turned out that the 3♠ bid was based on a somewhat mediocre 6-5 in the majors, and slam depended upon favorable lies of the cards in both majors. When they were both foul, the result was down 2.
We scored 8.5 out of 9 on both hands, propelling us from 16th place after one round up to 6th place, on our way to winning. Our opps achieved the rare "dairy round" - half and half.
#8
Posted 2014-April-07, 09:05
#11
Posted 2014-April-07, 17:28
I thought we would not be alone, in fact will have a lot of company even if we miss a slam when i passed at MP. Of course it also depends on the 3♠ hand, if it is stretched or a very aggressive one it can change everything.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#13
Posted 2014-April-07, 17:50
jogs, on 2014-April-07, 17:40, said:
Would you bid 4♥ with this hand?
People do not bid just because it is their turn to bid. (Even I don't do that )
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#14
Posted 2014-April-07, 18:01
ArtK78, on 2014-April-07, 08:03, said:
Fortunately for our result in the tournament, my partner did not pass. He bid 4NT, found me with one key card, and bid 6♥. The two hands:
Everything behaved, and 6♥ rolled (By the way, no coughing was involved - and, if it were, how do you show 2 singletons?).
Just goes to show that sometimes you have to do the wrong thing at the right time.
As I mentioned above, this hand was played against one of the better pairs in the event. This was the second board of the round (fourth of the event). On the preceding board, my partner opened 3♣ at favorable vul. My RHO bid 3♠, and my LHO, with a huge hand, key carded and settled for 6♠. Turned out that the 3♠ bid was based on a somewhat mediocre 6-5 in the majors, and slam depended upon favorable lies of the cards in both majors. When they were both foul, the result was down 2.
We scored 8.5 out of 9 on both hands, propelling us from 16th place after one round up to 6th place, on our way to winning. Our opps achieved the rare "dairy round" - half and half.
I would have bid non Leaping Michaels on this hand of course. Now it is quite easy to bid slam. Bidding 4NT over 4H shows a lack of judgement in my opinion.
#16
Posted 2014-April-08, 05:42
the hog, on 2014-April-07, 18:01, said:
Since we were not playing non leaping Michaels, that option was not available to me. Nor was it likely available to anyone in the event.
It is my belief that non leaping Michaels is a convention that exists in these Fora and not in real life (at least in North America). I have never even heard it mentioned anywhere but in these Fora.
#17
Posted 2014-April-08, 06:27
ArtK78, on 2014-April-08, 05:42, said:
It is my belief that non leaping Michaels is a convention that exists in these Fora and not in real life (at least in North America). I have never even heard it mentioned anywhere but in these Fora.
Really! I cannot believe that you have never heard of it apart from here Do you know Bridgewinners?
.I guess the folk on Bridgewinners have never heard of it either? Perhaps you might try these links I have googled for you.
DEFENSIVE AND COMPETITIVE BIDDING LEADS AND ...
bridgefiles.net/pdf/shea-commins.pdfW B F CONVENTION CARD. OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; ... Non leaping Michaels only over 3S ie. 4C=C+H. Fit jumps apply in competitive ...- [PDF]
Fick/Ward
www.sabf.co.za/trials/cc/fick_ward2.pdfMar 19, 2014 - W B F CONVENTION CARD. OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; .... Non-Leaping Michaels. Normal, could be lighter ATV(According to ... - [PDF]
WBF Convention Card D C B A - Infobridge
www.infobridge.it/Sistemi_CC_dhondy-senior.pdfNon leaping Michaels. (3A)4B=B+M vs 1A, x=Ms, 1NT=ms. 2-level jumps are weak in the suit bid. 1A-1B: x=Ms, 1NT=ms. Redouble=10+, penalty-seeking, (oppo ... - [PDF]
Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; Reopening - ECatsBridge
www.ecatsbridge.com/documents/files/.../Wales/Goodman-Pownall.pdfW B F CONVENTION CARD. OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; ... Leaping and Non-Leaping Michaels. VS. ARTIFICIAL STRONG OPENINGS- i.e. 1♧ ... - [PDF]
O - BridgeWebs
www.bridgewebs.com/bgb/Alishaw.pdfW B F CONVENTION CARD. OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; Reopening) ... Non-leaping Michaels. SPECIAL, ARTIFICIAL & COMPETITIVE DBLS/ ... - [PDF]
Val Kennewell & Margaret Lane
www.wbu.org.uk/Int/2012/.../kenlaneWBF%20april2011-1.pdfW B F CONVENTION CARD. OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 ... Non leaping michaels over weak 3s note 14. over weak 2s. 2NT=16-17 bal, 3NT= 18+ bal or ... - [PDF]
CC - Della Monta Hackett - 17.04.13
www2.bridge.dk/.../Download.aspx?...Files%2FFiler%2FLandshold%2F...non-leaping MICHAELS: 3m -4m: both Ms, 3M- 4m: 5-5 with m +. oM); 3M - 4M: both ms, 4NT: 2-suiter, WK ... International-Convention-Card. ♤ ♥ © DBV e.V. ♢ ♧.
What 10 Conventions would you choose - Bridge Winners
bridgewinners.com/article/view/what-10-conventions-would-you-choose/Apr 5, 2013 - Anything that varied from this was a "convention. .... 2-suited overcalls (Michaels, Leaping Michaels, Non-Leaping Michaels, U2NT, U4NT…) 5.
- ]
Convention Card Editor - Claire Bridge
www.clairebridge.com/textes/conventions_2011/senior-dhondy.pdfDOUBLES. DEFENSIVE AND COMPETITIVE BIDDING. WBF Convention Card .... Non leaping Michaels. (3A)4B=B+M vs 1A, x=Ms, 1NT=ms. 2-level jumps. - [PDF]
Convention Card Editor
www.abfevents.com.au/events/anc/2012/systems/TAS_Women_1.pdfMichaels. Michaels. Cappalletti. Modified Cappaletti X=s.suit 2A = minors 2B = majors. X = T/O with Lebensohl Leaping Michaels. X = T/O Non leaping Michaels. - [PDF]
Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; Reopening
www.jcbl.or.jp/Portals/0/pdf/nec/2013Yeh%20Bros/CC_Mixed.pdfW B F CONVENTION CARD. OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; ..... (non)Leaping Michaels. Can be light with good distribution. VS. ARTIFICIAL ...
Bridge Techniques by Eric Rodwell 2010-2014 | NewInBridge
newinbridge.com/topics-collectionNowadays the whole world seems to play either this convention or something ... a method which gains substantially against the field: (non) leaping Michaels.
Discussion list regarding the Laws of the card game ...
comments.gmane.org/gmane.games.bridge.laws/38004Jan 4, 2008 - In my methods, a 4C overcall of 3D shows clubs and a major, the convention known as "non-leaping Michaels". My hand is such that I would, ...- [PDF]
Convention Card Editor - livebridge.net
livebridge.net/bbo/abf/cc/33642-251739.pdfPLAY CONVENTIONS. CONVENTIONS. AUSTRALIAN BRIDGE FEDERATION ... and redouble; Leaping Michaels;. Non-leaping Michaels; Specific 2-suiters. 5H.
Re: 2 part question
newsgroups.derkeiler.com › Archive › Rec › rec.games.bridge › 2013-04Apr 2, 2013 - South opens 3D and West bids 4C (non-leaping Michaels) showing a ... follow-up agreements, is the convention still worthwhile? Well, since ...- [PDF]
WBF Convention Card 2.18
neo-bridge.org/library/CC/Ostend2010/wales/jones-jones.pdfDec 15, 2009 - WBF Convention Card 2.18. Aggressive at ... vs wk 3 Dbl=t/o, non-leaping Michaels, 3NT to play,then 4Н is Baron and 4Б,4П Note#DOUBLE
#18
Posted 2014-April-08, 08:14
Funny thing. You listed 16 items in your post. Almost all of them were from outside of North America. I looked at the Bridgewinners article that you cited. Of the 44 posts in that article, exactly ONE mentioned leaping Michaels or non-leaping Michaels as one of the 10 conventions he would choose. And he bunched it in as part of a group of 2-suited overcalls.
I don't have access to the Rodwell article, as I am not a subscriber.
So i don't find your argument persuasive to a North American player.
#20
Posted 2014-April-08, 13:54
jogs, on 2014-April-08, 13:52, said:
You would bid 4♥ with this hand.
Now it would be 6♥-1.
Yes, I would bid 4♥ on this hand, and the result would be 6♥-1.
So, your point is that you wouldn't bid 4NT on my partner's hand. And I believe that everyone agrees with you - including me.
But the fact remains that he did do so, and it worked. And no coughing was involved.