Obvious 1N bid?
#1 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-May-07, 12:56
#2
Posted 2007-May-07, 12:58
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2007-May-07, 13:40
Bidding 1♠ probably less likely to land you in a doubled contract when partner is broke, will help in the competitive auction in some cases (would love to defend 3♥ on this hand after a spade raise by partner!), and will probably cause you to "miss" a lot of 15 opposite 9-10 games that weren't making anyway. It will also get partner to make the best lead if he ends up on lead.
In the long run it probably depends on how light you open. If game is pretty unlikely then 1♠ is probably the best bet. If you pass a lot of 11-12 point hands then bidding 1NT might be better.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#5
Posted 2007-May-07, 13:49
Another way to look at it is that we can get back to notrump (when he has a good hand) after 1♠ more readily than we can get to ♠s after 1N when he has a bad hand. We can find ♠s if partner has sufficient to stayman over our 1N, but he may have 4♠s and not enough to bid: Qxxx Jx xxxx xx would play pretty well in ♠s but is ugly as all-get-out in notrump as they run their 8+ minor suit winners.
And partner will have a bad hand more often than not.
I don't worry about 9 card fits.. we will find that (almost) no matter what I choose now.
I should bid 1♠, and I think that is the best call, but I suspect, as I said, that I'd bid 1N... I am a greedy bugger at mps....
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-May-07, 13:52
mikeh, on May 7 2007, 02:49 PM, said:
it's imps
#7
Posted 2007-May-07, 14:22
Jlall, on May 7 2007, 01:56 PM, said:
1s wtp?
#8
Posted 2007-May-07, 14:32
#10 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-May-07, 14:42
Fluffy, on May 7 2007, 03:41 PM, said:
Except that LHO may bid and you may get shut out.
#11
Posted 2007-May-07, 14:52
Jlall, on May 7 2007, 08:42 PM, said:
Fluffy, on May 7 2007, 03:41 PM, said:
Except that LHO may bid and you may get shut out.
Yeah, I normally play against weak sound fields and when they bid 1-1 you don't make game with balanced hands.
I probably should move to another country
#12
Posted 2007-May-07, 15:28
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
Posted 2007-May-07, 15:54
Harald
#14
Posted 2007-May-07, 16:03
1. Overcall 1N. Its hard to argue with this, since its kind of 'obvious'. But its so easy to see how 1N can just get beat up.
2. Overcall 1♠. If pard is broke, this is probably our best spot. If pard makes a move in a minor, we can investigate 3N.
3. Pass 1♥. What rates to happen is LHO will probably bid a forcing 1N and RHO bids 2 minor. I am not a happy camper.
I think I like:
1♠ - 9
1N - 6
Pass - 3
But I certainly wouldn't get upset if pard overcalled 1N.
#15
Posted 2007-May-07, 16:14
But, I'd overcall 1NT.
-P.J. Painter.
#16
Posted 2007-May-07, 16:17
#17
Posted 2007-May-07, 21:57
#18
Posted 2007-May-08, 13:25
kenrexford, on May 7 2007, 05:14 PM, said:
I play overcall structure in most of my partnerships, which switches X and 1NT (1NT is takeout, X is strong usually balanced). Double showing balanced seems safer than a standard 1NT here since when LHO has a penalty hand (X of 1NT or XX of a strong X) we can still stop in 1♠.
I suppose the only downside to a strong (15+) double is that the opponents won't get overboard and bid a bad ♥ game and go down. If you start with 1♠, they might get optimistic.
#19
Posted 2007-May-08, 13:56
Rob F, on May 8 2007, 11:25 AM, said:
kenrexford, on May 7 2007, 05:14 PM, said:
I play overcall structure in most of my partnerships, which switches X and 1NT (1NT is takeout, X is strong usually balanced). Double showing balanced seems safer than a standard 1NT here since when LHO has a penalty hand (X of 1NT or XX of a strong X) we can still stop in 1♠.
I suppose the only downside to a strong (15+) double is that the opponents won't get overboard and bid a bad ♥ game and go down. If you start with 1♠, they might get optimistic.
A lot of the modern OS players are using Herbert Negative over the Power x. You can make a power x on this, but its a guess on whether or not to pass 1♠.
#20
Posted 2007-May-08, 14:59

Help
