Matchpoints out of practice
#1
Posted 2008-March-12, 07:18
1. Love all, poor opposition
AKx
10xx
KJ10
Qxxx
partner deals. You play a pretty aggressive style of weak two 1st NV.
P 1D P 1H
P 2H P P
2S P P 3H
P P ?
2. Favourable, poor opposition
109x
J7x
xx
J109xx
partner deals
1H x P 2C
x P P 2D
P P 2H P
P 3D ?
how many of your actions so far do you agree with?
Now what?
#2
Posted 2008-March-12, 07:37
I would never double. I have seen too many weak pairs rolling home with ten tricks after this bidding and with 25 HCPS between them. (okay my pd won´t bid 2 Spade with 2 HCps, but still...)
Hand 2: I am happy with my bidding so far and pass now. Yes I have a third heart, but I have shown anything else already.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2008-March-12, 07:51
2. Pard should have the strong NT hand with 4 hearts. Pass now.
#4
Posted 2008-March-12, 08:03
whereagles, on Mar 12 2008, 02:51 PM, said:
Should have said, you play strong NT 5-card majors.
#6
Posted 2008-March-12, 08:23
(2) I wouldn't have had the guts to pass 2♣x. I pass 3♦. Pard should know my hand, approximately, and is better placed to make the final call than I.
#7
Posted 2008-March-12, 09:26
2. I don't think xx trumps is enough to double (which is the only "surprise" for partner I have).
#8
Posted 2008-March-12, 09:49
I would not have sat for 2Cx, I would have bid 2H instead. Having been able to bid 2H last round, I don't feel any need to any call over 3D.
#9
Posted 2008-March-12, 09:53
2. The vulnerability screams double, but I just don't quite seem to have enough. It is very tempting, because partner is probably 4=5=3=1 with a good hand and may be able to lead trump effectively.. but I just don't have anything to offer other than holding a trump x that he might be fearing the opps hold... if he felt he had a good shot at beating 3♦ given I have said we can beat 2♣, then he could often double.
#10
Posted 2008-March-12, 09:56
2. I would have bid 2♥ a round earlier instead of passing the double. At this point what could there be to think about?
#11
Posted 2008-March-13, 08:39
Number 1:
The opponents are poor players, and one feature of poor players is that they won't double you without good trumps. 3S will be going off in 50s.
I have a sneaking suspicion that mikeh is right and that double is correct, not least because I know they bid 3H on hands that they shouldn't (we got 500 from a similar protection earlier when our contract was going off).
Anyway, I passed - I was also worried it was a 4-3 spade fit - and my partner thought I should have bid 3S because my defence to 3H isn't great.
You are getting a rotten result whatever you do, because (this being England) much of field is playing in 1NT going off. 3H makes exactly. 3S is one or two off depending on the defence. Partner has
Qxxxx
Qx
Qx
J10xx
Pass = 7 matchpoints
Double = 0 matchpoints
3S = 27 or 49 matchpoints
No. 2
I was very surprised that my partner bid 3H over 3D, glad to see this being confirmed as a silly idea! 3D is one off assuming you make the obvious trump lead. 3H is two off but went one off (you usually gain a trick in the play at this club).
If you bid 2H directly over the double, or over partner's double of 2C, you play there and make 110 for about 55 matchpoints.
3H-1 was 31 matchpoints
3D-1 is 49 matchpoints
3Dx-1 is 75 matchpoints, but I'm not convinced I would have doubled with opener's hand.
#12
Posted 2008-March-13, 11:35
1. I am not sure what partner would pass twice on before introducing spades. This might be a four-card suit.
2. I would not have passed 2♣ doubled.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#14
Posted 2008-March-14, 02:46
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.