Will you consider LHO's possible preemptive bidding when you make your decison?
a superfit bidding problem
#1
Posted 2004-May-21, 06:07
Will you consider LHO's possible preemptive bidding when you make your decison?
#2
Posted 2004-May-21, 06:21
Nice mixture of preemptive and constructive qualities.
Just hope that I know whether we're playing DOPI/DEPO/ or what...
#4
Posted 2004-May-21, 08:12
#5
Posted 2004-May-21, 08:32
Don't like voidwood because if I hear 2 keys and they turn out to be ♥AK, I'm in trouble on the obvious club lead.
#6
Posted 2004-May-21, 11:58
whereagles, on May 21 2004, 09:32 AM, said:
Don't like voidwood because if I hear 2 keys and they turn out to be ♥AK, I'm in trouble on the obvious club lead.
I see the problem but this problem is only when partner has only the AK heart of the keycards, only a club lead only when partner has no K of club or sgl, or even the Q. How will bidding 4d make it better ? will you know more about the cards you need ?
#7
Posted 2004-May-21, 13:14
Mike

so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.
#8
Posted 2004-May-21, 14:09
hrothgar, on May 21 2004, 12:21 PM, said:
Nice mixture of preemptive and constructive qualities.
Just hope that I know whether we're playing DOPI/DEPO/ or what...
I agree provided that our agreements are in order and partner will recognize it as voidwood and know what to do if they bid 5S.
If this is not the case, I bid 6H.
#9
Posted 2004-May-21, 14:26
mikestar, on May 21 2004, 03:09 PM, said:
hrothgar, on May 21 2004, 12:21 PM, said:
Nice mixture of preemptive and constructive qualities.
Just hope that I know whether we're playing DOPI/DEPO/ or what...
I agree provided that our agreements are in order and partner will recognize it as voidwood and know what to do if they bid 5S.
If this is not the case, I bid 6H.
It doesnt have to be voidwood, just show a void and slam invitation, exactly what you have, partner will now estimate his hand based on your spade void.
#10
Posted 2004-May-21, 18:08
#11
Posted 2004-May-21, 20:41
The_Hog, on May 22 2004, 12:08 AM, said:
What do you do if the bidding proceeds (4S) X?
Do you pass because you have let partner in on the desicion making process, or do you bid on (5C?) because of your extra offence?
Eric
#12
Posted 2004-May-22, 00:54
#13
Posted 2004-May-22, 02:15
The_Hog, on May 22 2004, 06:54 AM, said:
I don't think you understood my question.
The bidding has gone
1♥ 1♠ 4♦ 4♠
X P ?
#14
Posted 2004-May-22, 04:27
Pass! We are in a forcing auction and pass by opener would be forcing. His X is therefore totally penalty oriented. He has 3 decent s cards and my hand is not so great anymore.
#15
Posted 2004-May-22, 05:02
4♦ will help us better on competitive bidding, but I think 3♠ can help a bit more looking for slam, instead of forcing our patner to show his key cards, I prefer to make splinter, and if able reopen with 4♠, that shows void with limit values for slam, and partner is the guy to ask for keycards if likes to do so.
#16
Posted 2004-May-22, 06:08
The_Hog, on May 22 2004, 10:27 AM, said:
Pass! We are in a forcing auction and pass by opener would be forcing. His X is therefore totally penalty oriented. He has 3 decent s cards and my hand is not so great anymore.
So 4♦ sets up a forcing pass?
If you have that agreement that is fine, but I didn't think it was standard for fit jumps to do that.
Eric
#17
Posted 2004-May-22, 06:21
#18
Posted 2004-May-22, 07:27
Ben
#19
Posted 2004-May-22, 08:04
inquiry, on May 22 2004, 01:27 PM, said:
Ben
Maybe it is standard then (if anything about fit jumps can be called standard).
It certainly makes sense as an agreement, but it does mean you need to have a minimum defensive strength in your fit jumps.
♠x ♥xxxxx ♦KQJTx ♣xx looks like a FJ to the 4 level if it doesn't set up a forcing pass, but not if it does.
Eric
#20
Posted 2004-May-23, 02:29
Misho
1♥-(1♠)-?