BBO Discussion Forums: help for me - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

help for me Sistem 5° Major diamond 4°

#1 User is offline   deep 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 153
  • Joined: 2008-January-10

Posted 2009-October-06, 08:18

Scoring: MP


1 (pass) 1NT (pass)
2 (?)
What bid South better pass 0r ! for reopen bid
Ty at all for help
0

#2 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-October-06, 08:37

I might double directly over 1.

But having passed once, I would do so again, and let partner balance.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2009-October-06, 10:37

pass first in, dble second time. Pretty clear IMO.

1) doesnt have the values for a dble initially, making these light t/o doubles hamstrings partner when he really wants to bid 3N with some 14 count after 1d x 3d.

2) Both opposition have limited their hands so this is a clear pre protect. You have decent shape so get in the auction, letting them play 2d is seldom a winning strategy, particularly when your lho has denied a 4cM.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#4 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-October-06, 10:39

I'd double the second time around.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#5 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2009-October-07, 01:18

Pre-balance, Dbl, seems right, we can hardly expect to get rich in defending 2D and partner might have too many diamonds to balance in.
0

#6 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2009-October-07, 02:42

billw55, on Oct 6 2009, 04:37 PM, said:

I might double directly over 1.

But having passed once, I would do so again, and let partner balance.

This is not a life auction anymore: LHO will pass. Therefore you are balancing when you are bidding. You have the perfect distribution for a balancing double. Partner won't.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#7 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-October-07, 02:44

Trinidad, on Oct 7 2009, 03:42 AM, said:

billw55, on Oct 6 2009, 04:37 PM, said:

I might double directly over 1.

But having passed once, I would do so again, and let partner balance.

This is not a life auction anymore: LHO will pass. Therefore you are balancing when you are bidding. You have the perfect distribution for a balancing double. Partner won't.

Rik

yep
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users