manudude03, on Aug 31 2010, 04:23 PM, said:
| Dealer: | South | | Vul: | None | | Scoring: | IMPs | | | |
BBO tourney, pre-dealt hands.
You land in 7NT and receive the
♠6 lead. (clubs break 5-1, East having 5)
Pure guesswork?
The lead makes it unlikely that West has the queen of
♠.
I see 2 lines of play:
Line 1:
When you test the
♣ by reaching hand via the ace of
♦ you will see in time that you can not afford a red suit discard.
Discard the ten of
♠ and since you will need the
♦ finesse, hook and check whether
♦ break 3-3
If not, cash the
♠ ace and come back with ace of
♥ and discard
♦ on the remaining
♣ assuming West will not relinquish his high
♦.
Finally finesse in
♥ by leading the jack.
If West is long in the red suits he will be squeezed so that the
♥ suit will run.
You need West to have Qxx in
♦, or both red queens with length or the
♥9 must drop .
Line 2:
Come to hand at trick 2 with the ace of
♥
When West discards on the second
♣, discard a
♦ and run the jack of
♥, hoping for 4 tricks in
♥.
If they materialize play king and ace of
♦, on which East will be squeezed between the black suits.
If
♥ plays for 3 tricks only (West having
♥Q9xx or longer, since you can not afford to repeat the
♥ finesse), you need the queen of
♦ with West.
Cash the second
♠ trick, come to the ace of
♦ and discard now the ten of
♠ on the third
♣. On the fourth
♣ West will be squeezed in the red suits.
Line 2 is superior, because
♥ are more likely to run for 4 tricks than
♦ for 5. In either case the second red suit finesse is not required.
However line 2 is a bit of hindsight:
If
♣ break reasonably you prefer to come to the ace of
♦, because leaving your
♥ intact gives much better squeeze chances for the 13th trick.
Rainer Herrmann