Those pesky preempts part #21,852
#1
Posted 2010-September-05, 21:27
♠ Q ♥ AK87652 ♦ 7532 ♣ A
RHO opens 4♠ in 3rd seat.
Go quietly or stick you neck out? Does it make a difference if hrothgar is on your right?
#2
Posted 2010-September-06, 01:55
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2010-September-06, 03:21
#4
Posted 2010-September-06, 03:55
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2010-September-06, 05:28
in fact a bigger danger might be they get to 6S after I bid - 4S - 5h - 5s - p - 6S when opener raises himself looking at a heart void when it was just going to go 4S all out. not very likely though so it's not going to stop me
#6
Posted 2010-September-06, 05:34
This is only a marginal effect and it doesn't change anything.
George Carlin
#7
Posted 2010-September-06, 07:00
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#8
Posted 2010-September-06, 07:02
#9
Posted 2010-September-06, 10:15
5♥. Hopefully pard is aware of the 4N...5x...5♥ plan to show a really good 5♥ call.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2010-September-06, 13:03
karlson, on Sep 6 2010, 09:21 AM, said:
I've seen someone going for -1700 in a similar situation, and he had ♦KQJT98. Naturally, his LHO had the remaining diamonds.
But 5♥ is really a no-brainer, regardless of preempt style.
#11
Posted 2010-September-06, 13:32
#12
Posted 2010-September-06, 14:10
#13
Posted 2010-September-06, 18:07
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#15
Posted 2010-September-06, 18:19
TimG, on Sep 5 2010, 10:27 PM, said:
Can't even begin to imagine why you think that is relevant when you have a completely obvious bid (or even if you didn't have an obvious bid).
#16
Posted 2010-September-06, 18:52
For what it is worth, here is the full deal. I expect that most people did not open 4♠ (some must have had to deal with a 2nd seat 3♣ opening), because the board was nearly flat: all 680s for EW except for an 850 and two 1400s.
#17
Posted 2010-September-06, 19:20
#18
Posted 2010-September-06, 19:37
Zelandakh, on Sep 6 2010, 08:20 PM, said:
On the contrary, I would expect more passers in a weak field than in a strong field.
#20
Posted 2010-September-07, 01:31

Help
