they pay a bonus for making game...
#1
Posted 2010-September-07, 09:40
♥Axx
♦xx
♣9xxx
NS vul, east dealer
(pass)-pass-(pass)-1♠
( 2 ♣ )- 3 ♣ -(pass)-3♠
(pass) - ? ?
#2
Posted 2010-September-07, 09:46
Fluffy said:
I'm glad partner realizes this too!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#3
Posted 2010-September-07, 09:48
But pass, xxxx of clubs is really not good when partner isn't short (unless his hand is very bad)
But I sort of abstain, doesn't everyone open this? We open random 12 counts but pass this?
#4
Posted 2010-September-07, 10:02
#5
Posted 2010-September-07, 10:06
jdonn, on Sep 7 2010, 10:48 AM, said:
But pass, xxxx of clubs is really not good when partner isn't short (unless his hand is very bad)
But I sort of abstain, doesn't everyone open this? We open random 12 counts but pass this?
This is only 11HCP who cares if it is 5 controls and 3 quicktricks
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#6
Posted 2010-September-07, 10:21
After a fourth seat opener I'm passing.
#7
Posted 2010-September-07, 11:36
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#8
Posted 2010-September-07, 11:37
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2010-September-07, 13:18
Oh, I'm in second seat? Partner knows I could have this hand? Pass - I made my decision on the first round. I found the SA after passing? Okay, maybe 4S.
What was I going to do when partner bid 4S? It's the same problem - he's never playing me for no spade losers and the HA.
#10
Posted 2010-September-07, 15:46
It's a vuln game, we just need thirtysomething percent.
#11
Posted 2010-September-07, 15:56
MFA, on Sep 7 2010, 04:46 PM, said:
It's a vuln game, we just need thirtysomething percent.
Yes I want an undo lol. I was just bitter I hadn't opened I guess
#12
Posted 2010-September-07, 16:15
Both numbers are great for a game, even NV. Even with the adjustments a simulation will need (double dummy play) I think the reason for passing is more respect for partner than expectancy of making/going down. Sort of leading partner's suit when in doubt, am I right?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#13
Posted 2010-September-07, 16:47
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#14
Posted 2010-September-07, 16:52
Hanoi5, on Sep 8 2010, 12:15 AM, said:
I really don't hope so, since that would be a horrible reason not to raise. We are not respecting partner when we are being blindly obedient to him, whatever the situation, but rather when we try to always make our best possible evaluations and act consequently on those. Partner can't see our cards for us, only we can.
And leading partner's suit 'when in doubt' is bad also.
#15
Posted 2010-September-07, 20:31
Hanoi5, on Sep 7 2010, 04:15 PM, said:
Both numbers are great for a game, even NV. Even with the adjustments a simulation will need (double dummy play) I think the reason for passing is more respect for partner than expectancy of making/going down. Sort of leading partner's suit when in doubt, am I right?
I assume the sims were all of opening bids which did not , and should not, accept the 3C game try; yet they still made game about half the time. Also none of the decline hands can have a red-suit retry with a concentration there. Otherwise the sim only shows that game will make a lot of the time opposite an opening bid, and is meaningless.
If it makes so often when opener declines and also can't retry, I will rethink my position about not accepting my own game tries.
#16
Posted 2010-September-08, 02:31

Help
