BBO Discussion Forums: Need a Road Map - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Need a Road Map We got lost along the way

#1 User is offline   masse24 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 342
  • Joined: 2009-April-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago Suburbs

Posted 2010-September-16, 16:56

Scoring: IMP

North Dealer.
Bidding proceeded:
2 (P) 2 (P)
2NT (P) ??


Suggestions on how to navigate at least somewhat scientifically to the slam? :angry:
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   junyi_zhu 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 536
  • Joined: 2003-May-28
  • Location:Saltlake City

Posted 2010-September-16, 17:04

masse24, on Sep 16 2010, 10:56 PM, said:

Scoring: IMP

North Dealer.
Bidding proceeded:
2 (P) 2 (P)
2NT (P) ??


Suggestions on how to navigate at least somewhat scientifically to the slam? :angry:

It is difficult. If you don't have suit quality requirement for 3D over 2C, it's OK to bid 3D. Now you can bid 4C as a transfer to D, then cuebid S. Now your pass the ball to partner, if he likes his hand, he'd bid 6D. Don't expect a lot of science after 2NT.
0

#3 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2010-September-16, 20:17

EDIT: After posting and THEN thinking it over, there is too much risk to put Opener in slam when missing 2 key cards ( overall ) .
Not only could they be the dAK, you could also be missing the 2 red Aces.
Responder has to sign-off in either 4NT or 5D.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

My method would have to assume Opener has at least one top Diam honor:

May ACBL Bulletin treatment with "right-siding" modification by Fred Hamilton and my modification of TURBO-type "showing" of key cards by opener:

After:
2NT( 22-24) - 3S! ( relay to 3NT! since direct 3NT = 4/4 in Majors )
3NT! - 4C! ( slammish, long Diam )
4D! ( 1st step = 0 or 3 key card showing ) - 6D ( off 2 key cards but hopefully partner has dA or dK )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If Responder had a stiff Sp, then Responder would sign-off in either 4NT or 5D;
probably 5D.
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#4 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-September-17, 03:01

What are your methods?

Lacking any methods I would bid 6C with the south hand. Opposite 22-24 I think we often want to be in slam.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#5 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2010-September-17, 03:16

hanp, on Sep 17 2010, 04:01 AM, said:

What are your methods?

Lacking any methods I would bid 6C with the south hand. Opposite 22-24 I think we often want to be in slam.

I think that is now known as the "Piltch ( Slam Bid )" when you hold a 6/4 .
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#6 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-September-17, 03:46

Seems normal, give partner Axx and AQJx for example.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-September-17, 04:10

you've got to start with 3 on this hand, the bidding is too messy otherwise.

On the other hand after 2-2-2NT, partner has KQx and you still make diamond slam, so just bidding it is probably a good idea.
0

#8 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-September-17, 04:18

I wouldn't bid 3D.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#9 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,855
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-17, 09:15

Hi,

most peoble use 3S over 2NT as a bid to help in the investigation of minor
suit slams.

This would be your best bet.

We use it, to show a for single suited minor hand, other play it
as Minor Suit Stayman.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2010-September-17, 09:15

Fluffy, on Sep 17 2010, 05:10 AM, said:

you've got to start with 3 on this hand, the bidding is too messy otherwise.

On the other hand after 2-2-2NT, partner has KQx and you still make diamond slam, so just bidding it is probably a good idea.

1) 3D! is a transfer to Hts

2) When 2 key cards are missing, the chances are only about 4-in-9 that you have a good chance of making 6D with Responder having an outside void.

--Missing the A K, your chances are slim to none

--Missing the A and either "rounded suit" A...essentially no chance

--Missing the K and either rounded suit A... fair-to-poor ( you must drop or successfully hook for the K and only lose one trick in that missing Ace suit ).

--Missing a trump honor and A... good chances

-- Missing A and a rounded suit Ace... good chances ( this hand is one of those cases ).
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users