Your plan with this 6-5 hand?
#2
Posted 2010-November-13, 19:17
cnszsun, on 2010-November-13, 18:57, said:
IMPs I'd probably open 1♠. MPs it's close between 3♠ and 1♠, I'd probably go for 3♠.
#3
Posted 2010-November-13, 19:26
#6
Posted 2010-November-14, 01:33
MarkDean, on 2010-November-13, 23:47, said:
Will your partner bid 4S with KT ???? KQ ????? Mine generally don't.
#7
Posted 2010-November-14, 08:43
My plan. is to open 1♠,
- If partner is upassed:
- he bids 1NT: 2[♦ .... and later 3♦
- he bids 2♣ : rebid 2[♦ .... and later 3♦
- he bids 2♦: rebid 3♦
- he bid 2 ♥ : 2♠ ... hoping I can rebid ♦ later
- he bids 2♠: 4♠
- If partner is passed
- he bids 2♣ (Drury fit): 4♠
- he bids 2♠ : 3♠ preempt.
- 1NT: 2♦
#8
Posted 2010-November-15, 03:49
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#9
Posted 2010-November-15, 06:52
andy_h, on 2010-November-15, 03:49, said:
Yes, but what if the right save is in ♦ ?
Besides, maybe they cannot make 4♥ ?
.....
#10
Posted 2010-November-15, 09:42
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#11
Posted 2010-November-15, 11:07
the hog, on 2010-November-14, 01:33, said:
For the stated colors and scoring I would expect a raise to be equivalent to a limit raise.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#12
Posted 2010-November-16, 02:05
In general - make up your mind, what to do with distributional hands with only a few HCPs,
before you get dealt such a hand, and stick with it.
One option is to include those hands in a weak two, a style played by Zia Mahmood and Michael
Rosenberg, they had also a structure to find out the 2nd suit, if there was one.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
Posted 2010-November-19, 08:36
#14
Posted 2010-November-19, 08:57
I really hate 2♠, partner will pass on way too many hands where we have an easy game. And if he supports to 3-level, there's no way for us to know if game is a good choice.
3♠ is similar to 2♠ imo, but a lot less risky imo so it gets 2nd place.