Double's not just aggressive, I think it's insanely aggressive
There was a hand in the Crockford's final last year (English teams championship, final = last 8 teams) where a similar, but slightly better, hand than this doubled many times and went for a penalty varying from 800 to 1400 against a NV game.
One hand proves nothing, but virtually everyone present except those who doubled was saying that double was 'silly', 'over-aggressive' etc; not 'unlucky' (I was keeping quiet because my husband found a double and our match was flat in 1400)
p.s. I was astonished to see that gnasher doubled on the hand in this thread
How aggressive are you? Takeout X with balanced hand
#22
Posted 2011-February-04, 17:14
I double but that probably is just further evidence of what happens when you turn a matchpoint fan loose in an imp game. It is definitely a minimum if not subminimum.
#23
Posted 2011-February-04, 17:59
I don't think poll options 3 and 4 are mutually exclusive. I would choose them both, because I AM a wuss, and I think doubling isn't aggressive, its foolish.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#24
Posted 2011-February-04, 19:09
I think double is very aggressive action and I think most good players would not double.
I still double because I think my bridge hero would :-) (Meck)
I still double because I think my bridge hero would :-) (Meck)