making 4
Page 1 of 1
atb IMP Pairs flame out hand 2
#3
Posted 2011-March-13, 01:55
I blame the second double.
4S would have worked and it was planned from the start to double and then show spades.
Although South is forced one level higher then he expected he should have sticked with his plan.
4S would have worked and it was planned from the start to double and then show spades.
Although South is forced one level higher then he expected he should have sticked with his plan.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#4
Posted 2011-March-13, 09:58
South, I would bid 4S over 4H showing a good flexible hand.
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#5
Posted 2011-March-14, 02:52
switch a north's spade with a west's club and 4♥X goes 500 against downs in 4♠ then everyone would bame south for not doubling a second time
Not much blame to go around really.
Not much blame to go around really.
#6
Posted 2011-March-14, 03:32
We had basically the same auction at MP (I was south), didn't even consider charging myself for the 2nd double, I mean...wtf. My dad also had the same auction (he was EW). Dan Wolkowitz had the auction 2H X 4H (lol) p p and asked me if he should bid 4S or double and I said I think not doubling is absurd.
I just mean, I think this is standard. Sometimes ***** happens.
I just mean, I think this is standard. Sometimes ***** happens.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#7
Posted 2011-March-14, 03:36
Fluffy, on 2011-March-14, 02:52, said:
switch a north's spade with a west's club and 4♥X goes 500 against downs in 4♠ then everyone would bame south for not doubling a second time
5♣ would be making then, despite the 4-0 break. Maybe we'd be blaming North for not converting 4♠ to 5♣?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#8
Posted 2011-March-14, 04:02
gnasher, on 2011-March-14, 03:36, said:
5♣ would be making then, despite the 4-0 break. Maybe we'd be blaming North for not converting 4♠ to 5♣?
But then someone would construct a 6133 hand that is off three tricks in either spades or clubs?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
Page 1 of 1