BBO Discussion Forums: Bidding after super-accept - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bidding after super-accept

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2012-September-09, 16:13

This might not be a GIB question, it might just be a bridge logic question...


I super-accepted, showing club shortness; HumanSouth super-accepted incorrectly showing heart shortness. Why does NorthGIB proceed past 3 at my table but not at the other table? I would think that South showing heart shortness would be more encouraging than club shortness.

This part is a GIB question: If you're going to proceed past 3, what in the world is 3N? It seems to me that it should be an offer of a place to play, showing a concentration of values in clubs.
0

#2 User is offline   semeai 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 582
  • Joined: 2010-June-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Interests:Having eleven-syllable interests
    Counting modulo five

Posted 2012-September-09, 16:53

From a bridge logic standpoint, this is backwards. North is much happier hearing about heart shortness than club shortness.

I suppose the discrepancy is just because the random seeds were different because of the different bids by South and not enough DD samples are used.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users