An exposed card
#1
Posted 2012-May-09, 16:03
This relates to a discussion on Bridgewinners. I'm rather hoping for an unanimous panel.
#2
Posted 2012-May-09, 16:05
#3
Posted 2012-May-09, 16:37
#4
Posted 2012-May-09, 20:27
jillybean, on 2012-May-09, 16:05, said:
Nope. That's only for major penalty cards.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#5
Posted 2012-May-10, 15:11
-- Bertrand Russell
#7
Posted 2012-May-10, 18:09
Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
#8
Posted 2012-May-11, 09:58
mgoetze, on 2012-May-10, 15:11, said:
Don't feel bad -- there are lots of people who have never encountered a minor penalty card and don't know that there is such a thing. So there would seem to be no reason to read the laws.
#9
Posted 2012-May-11, 13:10
#10
Posted 2012-May-11, 14:37
#11
Posted 2012-May-11, 15:13
#12
Posted 2012-May-11, 19:10
campboy, on 2012-May-11, 15:13, said:
Maybe. But does anyone remember the magazine Bridge Today by the Granovetters? They had a "Rueful Rabbit" competition where players sent in examples of silly plays that worked. One entry that was printed in the magazine involved a player taking a "marked finesse" into a minor penalty card. If the Granovetters, with all their experience, didn't know what a minor penalty card was, then I don't think it is unheard of for a director to be in the same position.
And in fact, many years ago I had a minor penalty card, and the director told me that I couldn't lead a card lower than the penalty card (a two) before playing it. I asked him to read me the law, and that is what a knowledgeable player should do, rather than waiving an incorrect penalty. Why not give everyone a chance to learn something?