Whooda thunk that the difference between South following low with ♦6 instead of the ♦5 would be enough for East to shift at Trick 2 instead of returning the diamond?
Page 1 of 1
Following small
#1
Posted 2012-September-26, 23:21
Whooda thunk that the difference between South following low with ♦6 instead of the ♦5 would be enough for East to shift at Trick 2 instead of returning the diamond?
#2
Posted 2012-September-27, 07:30
You have wonder what's in GIB simulations where letting East win with the K makes sense for South's hand (assumes SOuth plays DD) and what a return in the same suit could lose. Anyone want to imagine what could be that possibility?
#3
Posted 2012-September-27, 07:50
Does GIB give any signals? Why the D4 (and not the 3) at T2?
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#4
Posted 2012-September-27, 08:47
cloa513, on 2012-September-27, 07:30, said:
You have wonder what's in GIB simulations where letting East win with the K makes sense for South's hand (assumes SOuth plays DD) and what a return in the same suit could lose. Anyone want to imagine what could be that possibility?Can anyone with access to the code tell us why this happens?
#5
Posted 2012-September-27, 08:53
wyman, on 2012-September-27, 07:50, said:
Does GIB give any signals? Why the D4 (and not the 3) at T2?
GIB will frequently high-low to show a doubleton. Other than that, his card selection is based entirely on what he simulates will "work out best". He does not, for example, make suit-preference signals when giving his partner a ruff.
Page 1 of 1