Hand 2 from tonight
#1
Posted 2012-October-16, 21:35
If you pass or double, LHO will bid 2S, pass back to you. Now what?
In particular, what would your different bids mean--the only thing you've discussed with your partner is that you play Lebensohl, and negative doubles, but this auction or similar was undiscussed. We had discussed that systems were on over X and 2C, excepting when 2C was majors in which case X of 2C was "it's our hand, any shape that isn't bidding naturally" according to my partner.
Thoughts?
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#2
Posted 2012-October-16, 21:52
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#3
Posted 2012-October-16, 22:05
SteveMoe, on 2012-October-16, 21:52, said:
So your plan is to bid 2NT and try to leave partner in 3D?
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#4
Posted 2012-October-16, 22:35
#5
Posted 2012-October-16, 23:11
wank, on 2012-October-16, 22:35, said:
One of us felt we should (or did take an action) and the other thought that passing out in 2S was not ideal, but not unreasonable given the options. I'm here to poll the community.
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#7
Posted 2012-October-17, 01:20
mike777, on 2012-October-16, 23:15, said:
did i miss something here?
Tritto. Bidding on this is poor.
#9
Posted 2012-October-17, 03:05
For your question: X of 2 ♦ would still show- it is our hand. I cannot see a big diffence to a X of 2♣.
So the question is: Do I double with this agreements- we do have the majority of HCPS or do I pass, because my hand is crap and I will get overboard in many situations? I guess, with your agreement, I had doubled 2 ♦ and hope that partner has a take out double of 2 ♠ or that I can X 2 ♥ for take out... But I am not sure, whether passing 2 ♦ will win more often, because it avoids many bad 3 NT contracts.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2012-October-17, 07:15
#12
Posted 2012-October-17, 07:38
My high cards are close to a dbl, but with the number of shapely 14s that are opened 1N now and this awful 7, I'm really not comfortable even claiming ownership. And I'm certainly not comfortable doubling and then having to bid 3D when 2H comes back to me. And I'm definitely not good enough to rip 2M.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#13
Posted 2012-October-17, 08:32
wyman, on 2012-October-17, 07:38, said:
My high cards are close to a dbl, but with the number of shapely 14s that are opened 1N now and this awful 7, I'm really not comfortable even claiming ownership. And I'm certainly not comfortable doubling and then having to bid 3D when 2H comes back to me. And I'm definitely not good enough to rip 2M.
This was part of the conversation afterwards:
What is the difference between X-X and Pass-X. You seem to be saying that X-X is penalty, my partner was saying that it was TO and that Pass-X was "don't even look at your cards, just pass it out p."
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#14
Posted 2012-October-17, 08:56
pass and double is rare, convertible values not worth a double before but worth competing a bit further and also worth playing doubled if partner wants is possible but unlikelly (2NT is avaible as pick a minor). So is a hand that wants to double 2♠ for penalty but can't sit over 2♥X, I am not sure what the best meaning is.
#15
Posted 2012-October-17, 09:05
#16
Posted 2012-October-17, 09:07
BunnyGo, on 2012-October-17, 08:32, said:
What is the difference between X-X and Pass-X. You seem to be saying that X-X is penalty, my partner was saying that it was TO and that Pass-X was "don't even look at your cards, just pass it out p."
My understanding is that, today, your partner's approach would be wildly nonstandard. But there is likely a reason that your understanding and mine are similar, so take that for what it's worth.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#17
Posted 2012-October-17, 09:53
wyman, on 2012-October-17, 09:07, said:
I've been known to be out of touch with "standard" as well--especially after time away from playing.
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#18
Posted 2012-October-18, 15:51
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#19
Posted 2012-October-18, 16:20
BunnyGo, on 2012-October-18, 15:51, said:
So what were the other auctions? If RHO went nuts with the 2D bid, or if the field bid 2H because they have 45xx, or ... well, sucks but that happens, next hand. I don't think you lost this board on judgment unless it was in the POTH.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#20
Posted 2012-October-18, 20:37
wyman, on 2012-October-18, 16:20, said:
I didn't get to see the traveler, but the 2D bid was normal (was 54 and they had a 9 card spade fit). The others either got to play in 1NT or 3D all making.
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"