BBO Discussion Forums: Under/Over - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Under/Over

#1 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,861
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2012-December-14, 12:37



Before you say anything, I would have opened 1 but here we are.

How do you play XX here?

Now what?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
0

#2 User is offline   trevahound 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 193
  • Joined: 2008-September-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burien (Seattle) Washington

Posted 2012-December-14, 12:46

Doubler has made a mistake, in partner's opinion. I pass and await partner's hitting their next call. With me having a full opener, I suspect they're in big trouble. I took 1700 out of opps before in this situation.

In some local partnerships we play this XX conventionally instead of naturally, and there it is a transfer to 2s, occasionally to play there, but usually a lead directing (asking for a spade lead if RHO declares) heart raise.
"I suggest a chapter on "strongest dummy opposite my free bids." For example, someone might wonder how I once put this hand down as dummy in a spade contract: AQ10xxx void AKQxx KQ. Did I start with Michaels? Did I cuebid until partner was forced to pick one of my suits? No, I was just playing with Brian (6S made when the trump king dropped singleton)." David Wright
0

#3 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-December-14, 13:37

Yes - the redouble says that the doubler made a mistake, unless you play a variant of McCabe or some other conventional treatment of redouble.

On the other hand, the pass over the redouble should be for penalties, although not everyone plays it that way.

Still, pass by opener is clear.
0

#4 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2012-December-14, 14:05

View PostArtK78, on 2012-December-14, 13:37, said:

Yes - the redouble says that the doubler made a mistake, unless you play a variant of McCabe or some other conventional treatment of redouble.

On the other hand, the pass over the redouble should be for penalties, although not everyone plays it that way.

Still, pass by opener is clear.

One wonders what hand couldn't open something and would want to pass this XX for penalties.

Anyhow..XX (unless conventional) means that the doubler likely made a mistake. I'd expect a random 13 HCP minimum and it invites cooperation from the opener in penalizing the opp's runout.
0

#5 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-December-14, 14:28

View Postneilkaz, on 2012-December-14, 14:05, said:

One wonders what hand couldn't open something and would want to pass this XX for penalties.


x
QTxxxx
xxx
xxx
0

#6 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2012-December-14, 14:34

View PostArtK78, on 2012-December-14, 14:28, said:

x
QTxxxx
xxx
xxx


Considering that this sits under the weak 2 bidding and that the XX (for me) is 13+ HCP, I think I'm afraid to pass with this for penalties. I'd prefer that pass in this rare sequence where the double of a weak 2 is XX simply asks the doubler to do his own running (obviously here not having enough in to run to).

However, this may be the minority view but I think it is different from passing XX of a normal takeout double of a normal opening at the 1 level.
0

#7 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-December-14, 15:17

View Postneilkaz, on 2012-December-14, 14:34, said:

Considering that this sits under the weak 2 bidding and that the XX (for me) is 13+ HCP, I think I'm afraid to pass with this for penalties. I'd prefer that pass in this rare sequence where the double of a weak 2 is XX simply asks the doubler to do his own running (obviously here not having enough in to run to).

However, this may be the minority view but I think it is different from passing XX of a normal takeout double of a normal opening at the 1 level.

If you are not going to pass, what are you going to do?

Would you pass with x QTxxxxx xxx xx? Suppose I gave you the eighth heart?
0

#8 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2012-December-15, 02:08

pass,and see what happens.now it is necessary to confirm pd's purpose in further,invitation?penalty?minors?
0

#9 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,793
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-December-16, 16:46

#1 XX for blood

#2 Pass
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2012-December-16, 23:28

Redouble says it's our hand and doubler is in trouble.

I'm sitting for the redouble.

I agree that this hand is a 1 opener.
0

#11 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-December-17, 02:36

There is no need for responder to redouble just because they are in trouble. He can pass then double for penalties later. You'll sometimes get only 570 instead of 840, but the downside of tipping them off and giving them extra options is more frequent and may be more costly. There are two possible meanings for redouble:

1. Asking partner to cooperate in penalizing. I think this is the normal meaning. Here I would double if they bid clubs and pass otherwise.

2. Rescue, probably a two suiter. This is definitely not standard and less useful after a second seat preempt.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users