BBO Discussion Forums: your approach? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

your approach?

Poll: your approach? (26 member(s) have cast votes)

What is your take here?

  1. pass, Minimum, possible misfits (3 votes [11.54%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.54%

  2. 2 Diamonds, I have two suits, don't I? (10 votes [38.46%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 38.46%

  3. 2 Spades, 6 of them, what I have (4 votes [15.38%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 15.38%

  4. X take out, what I have (8 votes [30.77%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.77%

  5. I had not bid 1 Spade to begin with... (1 votes [3.85%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2013-February-25, 07:02

best is 1S followed by X.

2nd option is 2S at round one

I hate everything else.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#22 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2013-February-25, 07:24

I don't like 2♠. Yes, we have 6 of them, but it looks more like a 5 card suit to me. It seems better to bring ♦ in the picture, partner can easily show preference with 2♠ so we'll end up in a good fit if we have one. Dbl is more flexible (also brings ♥ into the picture) but I don't have much tricks in defense and I'm afraid partner will pass it out. So I'll bid 2♦.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#23 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-February-25, 10:37

View PostPhilKing, on 2013-February-22, 19:14, said:

I'm heartened by the fact that nobody could actually bring themselves to click the Pass option in the poll. It's a bit like when people say they are going to vote for the LibDems, but come election time never do.

I never vote in a poll that ascribes a motive to my choice. It's like the difference between voting for the LibDems, and voting for the LibDems whilst simultaneously endorsing their policy on the rights of insects.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#24 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-February-25, 10:54

View Postgnasher, on 2013-February-25, 10:37, said:

I never vote in a poll that ascribes a motive to my choice. It's like the difference between voting for the LibDems, and voting for the LibDems whilst simultaneously endorsing their policy on the rights of insects.

Yeh, I have trouble with polls which list the alternatives but add thoughts which are not mine, also. Tagging on just the systemic meaning of an alternative is fine, though.

Maybe the OP's who ascribe motive could give us outs:

2S--2H sucks
2S--2H doesn't suck
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

6 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users