Page 1 of 1
Forcing or Non-Forcing 3D?
#2
Posted 2013-August-16, 17:17
Almost forcing. This is an invitation to game in spades based on the existence of a possible double fit in diamonds. I suppose it can be passed with an absolute minimum with only 3 spades.
EDIT: I take that back; mike777 has a good point. Well, I might gamble and pass the bid with an absolute dreck, but I'd think of that as passing a forcing bid against agreements.
EDIT: I take that back; mike777 has a good point. Well, I might gamble and pass the bid with an absolute dreck, but I'd think of that as passing a forcing bid against agreements.
#4
Posted 2013-August-18, 17:19
Well, I doubt a beginner partner would dare try 3♦ if he had a slam try. Therefore I support akwoo's original answer.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#8
Posted 2013-August-19, 09:10
While the suggested rule that all ABBA auctions should be forcing is a good one, there is a difference between auctions where A is a minor and where A is a major. If A is a minor then the sequence should always be forcing. If A is a major then you can agree for it to be forcing too but the default in many systems is not-forcing (showing a 3 card limit raise with a good side suit). Of course, many systems have 1M - 2m; 3m show extras, and in that case the default there is obviously forcing too.
(-: Zel :-)
Page 1 of 1