BBO Discussion Forums: 41stWBTC欣赏:保守的Drijver(12) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

41stWBTC欣赏:保守的Drijver(12) USA2 Vs Nertherlands

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-September-20, 03:42

RR12,闭室:


结果:2S+3

闭室结果:齐亚4=



由于Drijver的保守,是的美国2队扳回了9imps
0

#2 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-September-20, 05:31

无独有偶,比利时 Vs 荷兰



结果:3S+1

2=双高花,和我们采用的方法是一致的,如果同伴叫3的话,我的理解是半阻击性的,不是邀局。
如果真想邀局,那么就该使用笨重的2nt(Heavy 2nt)做过度。你同意我的方案吗?
0

#3 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2013-September-20, 06:06

江湖老将马特尔对牌值的判断更准确些。他一邀请,齐亚当仁不让就进局了。
0

#4 User is offline   sfbcs 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 2012-May-20

Posted 2013-September-20, 06:40

确实需要有邀叫
0

#5 User is offline   twcho 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2013-September-20, 20:54

这副牌我也看了,感觉Drijver的不叫确实有点保守,当时我就问了评论员的意见,他说很可能是因为他们平衡叫非常凶,邀叫会有风险。
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users