Winstonm, on 2013-October-01, 09:09, said:
In any similar scenario, which way would you choose, the aesthetically pleasing or the practical? (Engineers, there is no budget for a bathroom remodel so you may skip ahead to the next question

)
For me functionality comes first.
If an object has the function of dispensing toilet paper then that is what it should do.
If an object has the function of looking pretty then that is what is should do.
Many objects have more than one function and looking pretty may be one of them. In my home that is the case for furniture, but certainly not for toilet paper dispensers.
I think this attitude is typical for engineers. Engineers won't think of remodeling the bathroom. They will think how to solve the issue at hand. An architect or someone more artistic might suggest a bathroom remodel. An engineer will go with whatever works at the lowest cost. If changing the rotation direction of the toilet paper solves the problem then that's the end of the story for an engineer.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg