BBO Discussion Forums: 微博:极具精彩的庄 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

微博:极具精彩的庄

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-November-06, 02:47


结果:5XE= 850

这是一副极具精彩的庄,非常少见的精彩!
牌后北家"抱怨"地说:你该首攻
南家说:你敢直接5,我认为一定有大牌。

请大家点击图片里的next,欣赏钢铁是怎样炼成的吧
0

#2 User is offline   000ffj 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 487
  • Joined: 2012-June-20

Posted 2013-November-06, 08:03

陈大师厉害,我疑惑的是,在首攻方块的前提下,这牌双明手的结果是什么?
0

#3 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2013-November-06, 18:08

庄家抓住了防守的失误,做成了。
但这个防守也太那个了。
0

#4 User is offline   dvd 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 624
  • Joined: 2013-April-15

Posted 2013-November-06, 22:04

这个庄在现场看了,美中不足的是用s9将吃了h,导致后面防守还有机会打宕。
0

#5 User is offline   yunling 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 652
  • Joined: 2012-February-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shenzhen, China
  • Interests:meteorology

Posted 2013-November-07, 23:10

5多半是D缺门,不首攻H没法想象。
0

#6 User is offline   byang 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 2011-July-18

Posted 2013-November-10, 20:43

烂首攻, 三仟分以上牌手都会拔, 特別听到五方块, 両套必拔定式都不懂, 好好念书, 不要晛丑了。
0

#7 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-November-10, 21:45

 byang, on 2013-November-10, 20:43, said:

烂首攻, 三仟分以上牌手都会拔, 特別听到五方块, 両套必拔定式都不懂, 好好念书, 不要晛丑了。


请你说话礼貌点,友好点,遵守桥牌论坛规则。论坛是大家相互学讨论的地方,不是胡乱厥词的场所。看看你说话的态度,就像在挣命一样,不要晛丑了!
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users