Help
Your call?
Page 1 of 1
(how high) to raise?
#1
- Experimental biddicist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,909
- Joined: 2010-January-02
- Gender:Male
Posted 2014-October-23, 05:57
MPs, BBO randoms all round the table.
Your call?
Your call?
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#2
- enigmatic
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,757
- Joined: 2009-July-31
- Gender:Male
Posted 2014-October-23, 06:56
matchpoints
none vul
BBO random ops and partner, who presumably I have never met
competitive auction
---> All condition are ripe for a totally random result.
Considering this, I think I will just pass. Partly because ops may have a misunderstanding of 3♠. And partly to avoid stupid comments from partner (3 pt bid beginnerzzzzzz). But not because it is any more likely to be right than anything else.
none vul
BBO random ops and partner, who presumably I have never met
competitive auction
---> All condition are ripe for a totally random result.
Considering this, I think I will just pass. Partly because ops may have a misunderstanding of 3♠. And partly to avoid stupid comments from partner (3 pt bid beginnerzzzzzz). But not because it is any more likely to be right than anything else.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
-gwnn
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2014-October-23, 07:28
All randoms huh? 5♣. There's a 110% chance someone will take the push and a 120% chance they'll bid game if you pass or bid 4♣.
#4
- Alchemist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,764
- Joined: 2004-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
- Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.
Posted 2014-October-23, 09:02
3♣ has the merit of preventing partner from bidding again later and getting us much too high... :\
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2014-October-23, 09:06
Siegmund, on 2014-October-23, 09:02, said:
3♣ has the merit of preventing partner from bidding again later and getting us much too high... :\
It sure does since it is an insufficient bid.
I would pass. Maybe they can make game but can't figure it out unless I confirm the club fit by bidding.
#6
- enigmatic
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,757
- Joined: 2009-July-31
- Gender:Male
Posted 2014-October-23, 10:32
Siegmund, on 2014-October-23, 09:02, said:
3♣ has the merit of preventing partner from bidding again later and getting us much too high... :\
Possibly brilliant at the table, but impossible on BBO
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
-gwnn
#7
- Experimental biddicist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,909
- Joined: 2010-January-02
- Gender:Male
Posted 2014-October-23, 12:43
ArtK78, on 2014-October-23, 09:06, said:
It sure does since it is an insufficient bid.
Sigh. Long day.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#8
- Experimental biddicist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,909
- Joined: 2010-January-02
- Gender:Male
Posted 2014-October-23, 12:45
whereagles, on 2014-October-23, 07:28, said:
All randoms huh? 5♣. There's a 110% chance someone will take the push and a 120% chance they'll bid game if you pass or bid 4♣.
All true, but if they're making, there's a 130% chance P will X on the grounds that he's got an ace and you must have a couple of defensive tricks for such strong bidding.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,366
- Joined: 2012-March-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Illinois
- Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer
Posted 2014-October-23, 13:20
Even though there's a fit, there's just not enough to raise. Pass.
By "not enough", I mean either high cards or distribution to provide trick taking power. Partner is very likely to go down at least 2 and probably 3 at a 4 level contract. There's also a good likelihood you'll be doubled at that level resulting in a complete MP zero.
By "not enough", I mean either high cards or distribution to provide trick taking power. Partner is very likely to go down at least 2 and probably 3 at a 4 level contract. There's also a good likelihood you'll be doubled at that level resulting in a complete MP zero.
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2014-October-23, 13:50
Jinksy, on 2014-October-23, 12:45, said:
All true, but if they're making, there's a 130% chance P will X on the grounds that he's got an ace and you must have a couple of defensive tricks for such strong bidding.
a preemptive raise is strong bidding???
#11
- Experimental biddicist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,909
- Joined: 2010-January-02
- Gender:Male
Posted 2014-October-23, 15:23
To BBO randoms, yeah.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#12
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 729
- Joined: 2010-August-03
Posted 2014-October-23, 15:57
our hand is so bad
Videos of the worst bridge player ever playing bridge:
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2014-October-23, 19:21
Jinksy, on 2014-October-23, 12:45, said:
All true, but if they're making, there's a 130% chance P will X on the grounds that he's got an ace and you must have a couple of defensive tricks for such strong bidding.
Strong bidding? Lol. 5C is preemptive. Anyway I would pass.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#14
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,568
- Joined: 2006-June-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Barrington IL USA
- Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey
Posted 2014-October-23, 20:00
whereagles, on 2014-October-23, 07:28, said:
All randoms huh? 5♣. There's a 110% chance someone will take the push and a 120% chance they'll bid game if you pass or bid 4♣.
You must play with different randoms than I do. I pass this. I expect 5♣X to get murdered and maybe they'll have a missunderstanding about what 3♠ means or fail to bid game anyhow (assuming it makes).
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2014-October-24, 03:05
With the conditions -- BBO, randoms all around -- it is all about why you are playing.
If your purpose is to engineer/screw around because you will never have to play with these people again, the answer is something other than 4C or Pass.
If the aim is to practice exercising judgement in competitive situations -- then observe the outcome -- you will Pass and let the opponents make the wrong decision, or you will bid 4C transferring them to 4S...they will never double 4C, BTW. but you have CHO to worry about.
I would try Pass. If a competent partner doubles 4S (or doubles 3S in the passout), I will support the puppies.
If your purpose is to engineer/screw around because you will never have to play with these people again, the answer is something other than 4C or Pass.
If the aim is to practice exercising judgement in competitive situations -- then observe the outcome -- you will Pass and let the opponents make the wrong decision, or you will bid 4C transferring them to 4S...they will never double 4C, BTW. but you have CHO to worry about.
I would try Pass. If a competent partner doubles 4S (or doubles 3S in the passout), I will support the puppies.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#16
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 560
- Joined: 2014-October-11
Posted 2014-October-24, 23:30
I see no point on bidding on such a poor hand. There are several downsides in going on. It might help oppo identify a good fit if one has xxx or xxxx in clubs and judges, correctly, that their partner is short. It might also encourage partner to lead A from Axxxxx against a spade contract, giving declarer a trick with his Kxx. And of course you might end up making a very expensive sacrifice.
#17
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2014-October-25, 04:31
Jinksy, on 2014-October-23, 05:57, said:
MPs, BBO randoms all round the table.
Your call?
Your call?
Raising clubs will only help opponents, not to us most of the time.
-I don't wanna play doubled too many clubs with this balanced hand
-I don't want them to play something higher either because 2♣ overcall made my hand worth zero defensive tricks, and I know pd's defensive values are reduced with my holding.
So why should I do something that will likely create one of these 2 unwanted positions for us most of the time?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#18
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2014-October-25, 19:32
MrAce, on 2014-October-25, 04:31, said:
Raising clubs will only help opponents, not to us most of the time.
-I don't wanna play doubled too many clubs with this balanced hand
-I don't want them to play something higher either because 2♣ overcall made my hand worth zero defensive tricks, and I know pd's defensive values are reduced with my holding.
So why should I do something that will likely create one of these 2 unwanted positions for us most of the time?
-I don't wanna play doubled too many clubs with this balanced hand
-I don't want them to play something higher either because 2♣ overcall made my hand worth zero defensive tricks, and I know pd's defensive values are reduced with my holding.
So why should I do something that will likely create one of these 2 unwanted positions for us most of the time?
Good points all.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#19
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,427
- Joined: 2005-August-12
- Gender:Male
-
Interests:Economics
Finance
Bridge bidding theory
Cooking
Downhill skiing
Posted 2014-October-29, 17:39
I am actually South? I have no clue how many clubs to bid, so I guess I have to give up on preemption and Pass, at least for now and probably for good. For me, there is a passable case for 4♣, and even a very weak case for 7♣ just so as to push the opponents into their makeable 7♠.
Page 1 of 1