Help
Souths problem
Spoiler
Norths Problem
Spoiler
thanks,
Eagles
Page 1 of 1
Big Hand, Average Hand Two Part Problem
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,831
- Joined: 2011-June-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:UK Near London
- Interests:Crystal Palace
Posted 2015-August-15, 14:12
Imps
Souths problem
Norths Problem
thanks,
Eagles
Souths problem
Norths Problem
thanks,
Eagles
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,485
- Joined: 2009-July-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:London
Posted 2015-August-15, 14:21
eagles123, on 2015-August-15, 14:12, said:
Imps
Souths problem
Souths problem
Spoiler
I tend to pass these hands, intending to double spades when it comes back to me, but of course it can go wrong.
eagles123, on 2015-August-15, 14:12, said:
Norths Problem
Spoiler
Might we not be in a better position if the opening bid had been passed round to me? Presumably we would balance here?
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
London UK
#3
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 457
- Joined: 2009-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Hilliard, Ohio
- Interests:income taxes, american history, energy
Posted 2015-August-15, 15:55
South's problem 2NT intending to cue bid the spade void if partner makes a weak pref. Sure, we will often end up in wrong minor. After making this choice, I peek and see that opposite this advancer we end up in a good club slam. I actually chose it without peaking!
North's problem: pass: WTP? I can't guess a possible missbid here.
Actually, my partner has seen my unusuals at this vulnerability, might end up in game. Still, a NV game swing for us!
North's problem: pass: WTP? I can't guess a possible missbid here.
Actually, my partner has seen my unusuals at this vulnerability, might end up in game. Still, a NV game swing for us!
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 457
- Joined: 2009-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Hilliard, Ohio
- Interests:income taxes, american history, energy
Posted 2015-August-15, 16:01
PS: I saw the first hand before I answered the second.
#5
- Admirer of Walter the Walrus
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,563
- Joined: 2003-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
- Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.
Posted 2015-August-15, 22:40
I can well imagine this one going (1H) 2D float.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,703
- Joined: 2006-May-18
- Gender:Not Telling
Posted 2015-August-17, 04:34
Once upon a time a hand with 8 PTs started with a double. It is an agreement thing where the top end of an overcall comes. Old-fashioned pairs have an advantage on this hand but a disadvantage on others. Pay your money, take your choice.
(-: Zel :-)
#7
- Scotland
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,754
- Joined: 2008-August-22
- Gender:Male
- Location:Scotland
Posted 2015-August-17, 04:40
Both hands had a really tough problem here. The north hand cannot really afford to double and have it come back in 4S, so its 2D or pass. The other hand has a real struggle about whether to float 2d or pass. I think in this situation I would have maybe tried 3D. Really hate it, but its much too dangerous to pass at IMPS after south has passed, there is a pretty strong indication that partner has a decent hand. 3D doesnt show too much, although my trumps are obv bad, but if he bids 3N I will be very happy with an extra heart stop. If he bids 3H I can bid 3N happily myself. So 2D p 3D still leaves overcaller with an awful problem. I mean, I might well have tried 5D now. You basically have no idea what to bid and no more space.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
Page 1 of 1