BBO Discussion Forums: robot wont stop bidding his hand twice - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

robot wont stop bidding his hand twice

#1 User is offline   goffster 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 159
  • Joined: 2013-July-03

Posted 2016-June-10, 20:45

http://tinyurl.com/hrk9nbo

This is a frequent issue. robot bids hand once, uses hand generator to bid further and
is almost always wrong.
0

#2 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2016-June-10, 23:59

1- It should say that it is very difficult for Gibs to play against psyche.
2- I think your double isn't really a good bid, normally you would better overcall 2.
3- Don't be too hard on Gibs. Assume play with human partner and very hard on your human partner, similarly you would encounter many problems, you will have no pd for sure.
0

#3 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2016-June-11, 09:28

 lycier, on 2016-June-10, 23:59, said:

1- It should say that it is very difficult for Gibs to play against psyche.
2- I think your double isn't really a good bid, normally you would better overcall 2.
3- Don't be too hard on Gibs. Assume play with human partner and very hard on your human partner, similarly you would encounter many problems, you will have no pd for sure.

Only your point #1 is relevant here... If GIB is going to try to simulate hands that are possible given the auction, he is going to have trouble when people have stretched the truth. (Note, it's South who did the most stretching, not West.) However, to examine the issue being reported...


There very well may be a hand such that the 4 bid is appropriate under pressure, but this isn't it. The description provided for 4 isn't extreme enough for such a hand, and the actual hand doesn't even meet the description. Can we come to an agreement as to whether the 4 exists and, if so, what it should show?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users