Macthpoints. Partner leads the AH. Carding agreements are UDCA, giving attitude on the lead of an AQ, else count. What card do you play at trick 1? What are your considerations?
Encourage or discourage?
#1
Posted 2016-August-26, 18:03
Macthpoints. Partner leads the AH. Carding agreements are UDCA, giving attitude on the lead of an AQ, else count. What card do you play at trick 1? What are your considerations?
#2
Posted 2016-August-26, 21:36
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#3
Posted 2016-August-26, 21:52
SteveMoe, on 2016-August-26, 21:36, said:
You do not have the ♥ 5
You are North
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#4
Posted 2016-August-26, 22:03
Jinksy, on 2016-August-26, 18:03, said:
Macthpoints. Partner leads the AH. Carding agreements are UDCA, giving attitude on the lead of an AQ, else count. What card do you play at trick 1? What are your considerations?
Ok it looks like my options are:
3h=continue hearts
8h=switch to club\\
jh=switch to spades.
I will ask for club switch.
Of course pard is fully expected to use his bridge judgement and expertise to do what he thinks best after my 8h. The 8h is not a demand, just my best suggestion.
#5
Posted 2016-August-26, 22:31
Jinksy, on 2016-August-26, 18:03, said:
Pd is likely to be leading from AKx(x). He has another 5-7 hcps on the side. Pd can have ♦A but it is unlikely given that they reached a game at MP with 22 hcp, E must have ♦A for his bid. (Assuming that 3♦ did not show a big hand)
In order to take 5 tricks, we need
A-3♥+2♣ tricks
B-3♥+1♦+1♣
C- If pd has KQT(x) ♠ he will play one now and we may score 2♥+2♠+1♣ (this is unlikely too that declarer bid 3 NT with no spade cards unless he has length in this suit)
D- 2♥+3♣ tricks
We are not in hurry of cashing our 3 ♥ tricks, (assuming that declarer holds Qx ♥) if we are setting them with 3 heart tricks options.
There are 2 big dangers;
1-We can not afford pd to shift to spades
2-We can not afford pd to play low ♥ at T2.
I would discourage. After all it is easier for pd to imagine Jxx ♥ by me. It is harder for him to play for Jxx ♥ if we encourage. He will assume we have the Q and plan the defense accordingly. It is also easier for pd to figure that IF we have a minor Ace, that is likely to be ♣ from the bidding of E.
mike777, on 2016-August-26, 22:03, said:
3h=continue hearts
8h=switch to club\\
jh=switch to spades.
I will ask for club switch.
Of course pard is fully expected to use his bridge judgement and expertise to do what he thinks best after my 8h. The 8h is not a demand, just my best suggestion.
You can not afford to throw a VERY likely trick for signal. (♥J) Especially at MP. So you are quite wrong with the meanings of your signal options)
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#6
Posted 2016-August-26, 22:49
I did not suggest we should play the Jh only what the JH would mean....if you have another way to tell pard to swtich to spades, clearly spades great you did not tell us.
I stand by what our signal options are.
#7
Posted 2016-August-26, 23:47
#8
Posted 2016-August-27, 01:31
mike777, on 2016-August-26, 22:49, said:
I stand by what our signal options are.
I know what you meant. But please at least try to understand when someone tells you, even if you could not figure it out yourself.
You are assuming (VERY WRONGLY) that pd will know you played J from J8x, or 8 from J8x or the deuce from J8x in order to give him preference.
- Partner does not know and will never know that you played J from J8x and not from J singleton or Jx.
- Partner does not know and will never know that you played 8 from J8x and not from 8x or 8xx.
- Partner does not know and will never know that you played smallest from J8x and not from Q8x or Qx
Thus none of those cards will mean anything about your intentions of which suit to shift! Why don't you show some effort to read the OP and what he said about the A or Q leads? And even if you did not bother to read, can't you at least just show some effort to understand when someone shows you, instead of keep on defending something blindly?
When pd starts with Ace, and dummy shows up with KQJT or QJT9 of this suit, it would be obvious that the cards you play would be suit preference (in NT) But you are wrongly assuming on the OP hand that pd will figure out that you do not have ♥Q when you play smallest from J8x and will take it as a club preference. Wake up!
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#9
Posted 2016-August-27, 02:49
I didn't have a coffee this morning, but aren't those compass points in the illustration out-of-sync
Having now had a coffee, it's a tough one but I agree with everything MrAce says.
Partner could possibly have (though statistically unlikelier) ♥ AKQx, and East has bid 3NT on a wing and a prayer. And you don't want to block the suit if that is the case.
Statistically more chance of having an honour card in ♣s, so I'm discouraging with ♥8 with UDCA.
#10
Posted 2016-August-27, 03:11
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
Posted 2016-August-27, 03:18
MrAce, on 2016-August-27, 03:11, said:
Thanks for that MrAce. I wasn't aware of the finer points of UDCA leading against No Trump contracts. In Britain, before UDCA, the lead of an ace against a no-trump contract demanded an unblock (highest card). Things change, and its good to read these forums as it gives me a modern perspective of what's happening now.
#12
Posted 2016-August-28, 10:49
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#13
Posted 2016-August-28, 16:46
Jinksy, on 2016-August-26, 18:03, said:
Hmmm... let me see...
1. That it is REALLY HARD to get these things right AT THE TABLE. (might bet my money on the declarer, if I had a choice...)
2. Never played a weak-1NT, but seems pd could have any of:
a. AKx => discourage b. AKxx => hmm... if I encourage, will he then continue low...? Not the best... c. AKQ => discourage d. AKQx => encourage e. AKxxx => encourage (but... do we open weak-NT w 5-card major...?) f. AKQxx => encourage
So guess I go for... Hmmm..... let me see...
#14
Posted 2016-August-28, 23:49
Stefan_O, on 2016-August-28, 16:46, said:
1. That it is REALLY HARD to get these things right AT THE TABLE. (might bet my money on the declarer, if I had a choice...)
2. Never played a weak-1NT, but seems pd could have any of:
a. AKx => discourage b. AKxx => hmm... if I encourage, will he then continue low...? Not the best... c. AKQ => discourage d. AKQx => encourage e. AKxxx => encourage (but... do we open weak-NT w 5-card major...?) f. AKQxx => encourage
So guess I go for... Hmmm..... let me see...
Pd can not have AKxxx or Q would have dropped on A. And if that is the case you can not cash more than 3♥ tricks without an entry to pd.
Pd can not have AKQxx or he would have led the Q in A-Q for attitude method.
Pd can not have AKQx for the same reason above.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#15
Posted 2016-August-29, 01:30
MrAce, on 2016-August-28, 23:49, said:
You mean, it will drop after I play my card, right?
Yes, and then pd will ponder who has the jack => I will wish I encouraged...
MrAce, on 2016-August-28, 23:49, said:
yes... but AK of ♥ leave room for ♣K, too, doesnt it?
#16
Posted 2016-August-29, 04:53
Stefan_O, on 2016-August-29, 01:30, said:
Yes, and then pd will ponder who has the jack => I will wish I encouraged...
You still don't see it.
How will encouraging help when discouraging won't ? Even if pd understood that 3 NT bidder is a moron and made that bid with stiff ♥Q and not playing Q from QJx or QJ9. Let's assume that this is the case and pd understood you and he also has ♣K (otherwise as I said it won't work) Now tell why you would wish you encouraged? What do you think would happen had you discouraged? He will shift to clubs, you will win and play ♥. You will still beat 3 NT if pd has ♣K.
You are making list of ♥ holdings for pd who started with A. And writing next to them encouraging or discouraging which one works (wrongly) as if they all have equal weight (wrong)
- Pd holding AKxxx is a very small probability due to auction.
- When he holds that, encouraging or discouraging does not matter.
I already told about other holdings (AKQx(x) ) when you thought (wrongly) that encouraging works. Pd can not have those or would lead Q. (according to A-Q for attitude, K for unblock/count agreement)
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."