[helene_t]

{comments}

---

)1S(One-level%20overcall%20--%205+%20%21S%3B%208-17%20HCP%3B%209-19%20total%20points)P2C(Good%20support%20in%20S%20--%203+%20%21S%3B%2011-%20HCP%3B%2010-12%20total%20points)D(11-21%20HCP%3B%20rebiddable%20%21C%3B%20%21CKQ%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)4S(5+%20%21S%3B%2014-17%20HCP%3B%2015-19%20total%20points)PPP&p=HJH3H4HASAS3S4S9&c=12

OK, it is just an example. It happens all the time. GIB seems not to take his partner's lead director into account when simming for the opening lead.

[Stephen Tu]

---

Use format:

[hv=urlgoeshere]400|300[/hv]

to avoid it being mangled and with a more readable size.

[lycier]

helene_t, on 2017-January-24, 17:49, said:

OK, it is just an example. It happens all the time. GIB seems not to take his partner's lead director into account when simming for the opening lead.

Yes, yes, I've had the same thought, don't know the reasons. Here my basic Gib will replay this hand to prove your correct point of view.

Hand-1

---

Lead ♥J, result is 4♠S+2

Hand-2 Gib's routine

---

Lead ♥J, result is 4♠S+2

[johnu]

helene_t, on 2017-January-24, 17:49, said:

GIB seems not to take his partner's lead director into account when simming for the opening lead.

Or opening bids, or overcalls, or ..... Sometimes it seems it doesn't look at its own long suit