How desperate are you to win?
#21
Posted 2019-April-13, 12:36
#22
Posted 2019-April-13, 14:28
however I think if you call director, which you're totally within your rights to, the actions of opponents kicking up a fuss/arguing is despicable.
#23
Posted 2019-April-13, 14:54
nekthen, on 2019-April-13, 11:58, said:
If you think you can do better, by all means get trained and and become a director.
I fully agree with you up to "you accept the decision". It's generally the case, but not automatic. If you are not convinced then you do not argue but you do ask why, and if he/she was unable to convince you by citing laws and regulations then you should politely say so and get on with the game but appeal later. Directors make mistakes too, as this one did. There is process to deal with it.
#24
Posted 2019-April-13, 15:06
If I was declarer I'd accept that an error was made and concede a ♠ and 2 ♥.
I'd also call the director if I was a defender and let the director rule. It was an irregularity, so it's up to the director to sort things out.
Look, we all make silly mistakes from time to time, if we are competent players then we should accept when we do so.
Where I might be a tad more understanding is if the declarer involved was a novice/newer player who is struggling to adjust to playing competitive bridge. The last thing that I'd want to do is turn off that player to playing duplicate by being overly strident trying to enforce the rules.
#25
Posted 2019-April-13, 17:27
#26
Posted 2019-April-13, 20:38
Tournament is another matter. Director gets called, and I would appeal the ruling if it didn't go my way, because it's obvious that the defenders should get to designate which card gets played.
Cheers,
Mike
#27
Posted 2019-April-13, 22:40
This type of situation, and there are many, should be handled by the director ... at our club the "director please" call is always a friendly encounter and a learning experience.
#28
Posted 2019-April-14, 04:41
Declarer may correct an unintended designation of a card from dummy until he next plays a card from either his own hand or from dummy. A change of designation may be allowed after a slip of the tongue, but not after a loss of concentration or a reconsideration of action. If an opponent has, in turn, played a card that was legal before the change in designation, that opponent may withdraw the card so played, return it to his hand, and substitute another (see Laws 47D and 16C1). 5
It seems to me in this case that nominating "any" could only be considered a slip of the tongue if the previous trick or tricks were called out as something like "any small spade" and it was clear that "any" was just a continuation of this.
#29
Posted 2019-April-14, 06:33
GrahamJson, on 2019-April-14, 04:41, said:
It seems to me in this case that nominating "any" could only be considered a slip of the tongue if the previous trick or tricks were called out as something like "any small spade" and it was clear that "any" was just a continuation of this.
But nobody calls "any small spade" which is pointlessly ambiguous: they call "a spade " or "small spade".
In this particular case he could logically have called "a spade" or even "high spade " if he wanted. The fact that he argued it was obvious that he intended SMALL spade indicates that he wasn't thinking clearly even after the mistake.
#30
Posted 2019-April-14, 06:43
#31
Posted 2019-April-14, 13:31
mikestar13, on 2019-April-14, 06:43, said:
I also object politely when opponents say "take it" or "ruff it".
#32
Posted 2019-April-15, 03:59
LBengtsson, on 2019-April-13, 07:10, said:
No, there was a club in dummy. This was the first discard.
SilentSong, on 2019-April-13, 17:27, said:
msjennifer, on 2019-April-13, 10:15, said:
Yes, the use of "desperate" was a little provocative and although it was used for rhetorical effect it was a bit over the top. On the other hand ...
IGoHomeNow, on 2019-April-13, 00:37, said:
Maybe "disgusting" is also over the top!
cherdano, on 2019-April-12, 11:13, said:
This was well put and reflects my own view. I was a little sad that declarer chose to argue his case. He is experienced enough to know better. Maybe declarer was a little too desperate to win?
#33
Posted 2019-April-15, 13:27
42xxbfxx42, on 2019-April-13, 22:40, said:
You're right about the first thing - Law 46A says declarer plays a card in dummy by naming the rank and denomination of the card. You're wrong, technically, about the second, because Laws 42A3 and 45B instruct dummy to place the card declarer has played in the played position. Declarer called for some card, so dummy has to do that. It is true that dummy's judgement might not be allowed to stand, for as has been said Law 46B5 allows either defender to designate the card to be played.
I agree fully with others that calling the director should not be a problem, should not be viewed as "desperation to win" and should not result in any acrimony on anyone's part. There was an irregularity. If the defense wants to ignore that and not call the director, they have that right (see Law 9). But if anyone draws attention to the irregularity, all four players at the table are responsible to call the director. Even if attention is not called to it, either defender can call the director. Once that it done, what happens is up to the director, and to no one else, save that a contestant who disagrees with the director's ruling is entitled to appeal.
There is this "don't call the director in clubs" idea. I think it's a bad idea. Even club players ought to learn the rules of the game they're playing, and learn to accept with good grace the director's ruling when given.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#34
Posted 2019-April-15, 18:05
etha, on 2019-April-13, 04:53, said:
Proper procedure is that dummy plays the cards for declarer if she is at the table and is physically capable. I know that I would find it distracting if declarer played the cards every time. It is not like rubber bridge, where the cards are played into the middle of the table.
msjennifer, on 2019-April-13, 10:15, said:
It is surprising how many players think that in the same breath is a thing. It is not.
#35
Posted 2019-April-16, 07:19
Vampyr, on 2019-April-15, 18:05, said:
I'm unduly sensitive to distraction, but I don't find it a problem when declarer plays the cards herself, so long as she does the whole thing effectively and without indecisions. Yes it's a bit irritating if she plays the card towards the middle of the table, but I can live with that. I find it more of a distraction when dummy is playing the cards but continually reorders them or gets a bit too involved in play, without clearly meriting a Director call.
#36
Posted 2019-April-16, 09:46
#37
Posted 2019-April-16, 11:57
As declarer, I should realize that I had made a big mistake and take my medicine.
#38
Posted 2019-April-17, 16:06
pescetom, on 2019-April-16, 07:19, said:
Mind you, many of us cannot reach far enough to play the card behind the dummy hand. I normally play the card near the board (on it if I am N/S) and then put the quitted card into the board.
But I feel that it is desirable to follow the procedure in the Laws.
I had a friend, a very good player, with whom I played sometimes. EVERY time he was dummy he was either at the bar (he was a big drinker) or having a fag. I found it really annoying to have to play every dummy myself.