[benellis58]

West wins his heart JACK at trick one. At trick two the MONUMENTAL imbecile...SWITCHES...to a...DIAMOND!

https://www.bridgeba...HT%7Cpc%7CC2%7C

[benellis58]

At another table, the EW "defence" on the same board as in post #1481 immediately above was even MORE hilarious. I'm beginning to think that the GIBBO robots have a competition among themselves to see who can come up with the MOST stupid actions in each game.

https://www.bridgeba...CH7%7Cmc%7C9%7C

[benellis58]

South's 3C bid shows a hand that is rejecting North's invitation to 3NT while at the same time stating that that he wants to end the auction in 3C or 3D. Thus, North AMAZINGLY did the "right" thing by passing, because I have OFTEN (TOO often!) seen the twit bid 3NT in such auctions, almost always, not surprisingly, for a BAD result. The ironic and amusing thing is that if he ever had a reason to bid ON, THIS hand was the one (!), as he had a GREAT hand (considering his bidding up to this point) in support of clubs, and might well have considered a raise to 4C. I'm not criticizing his pass (and wish he would do it more often!), but I'm pointing out his BIZARRE approach to bridge, as he bids ON when he definitely should not, but quickly PASSES when he might well consider making a further move. Characteristically bass ackwards in logic. I was surprised and pleased to score 100 % on the board.

https://www.bridgeba...S8%7Cpc%7CCT%7C

[benellis58]

North's double of 4S is described in a typically pathetic, worthless, and useless GIB definition as "8+ HCP". NOTHING else is stated, so the definition is typical BBO garbage.

But here's the FUNNY thing: The paragraph above is NOT why I'm posting this hand. MANY (perhaps even most) GIB definitions ARE utter garbage, just as this one is. I don't post the vast majority of them, because it would take me till the year 2525 ("if man is still alive, if woman can survive", as Zager and Evans would add) to list ALL the GIB nonsense.

I am posting THIS hand and THIS execrable GIB definition because...the harebrained dolt of a GIBBO robot in the North doesn't even come CLOSE to matching this pathetic definition, his own GIB definition. He does NOT fulfill the one and ONLY requirement of the piece of trash definition ("8+ HCP"), because his HAND is 954, 63, KQ76, 10742 - a mere FIVE (!) HCP - a full THREE fewer than the MINIMUM "promised" by the worthless GIB definition! It is LAUGHABLE how TOTALLY useless and BROKEN the GIBBO robots are, how PATHETIC the GIB definitions are, and what an absolute JOKE the antiquated, unworkable, illogical, poorly designed GIBBO system is.

Why has all this GIB/GIBBO garbage not been incinerated long ago and replaced by a DECENT system, DECENT definitions, and DECENT robots?

https://www.bridgeba...C8%7Cpc%7CCT%7C

[benellis58]

Question: How can you be certain that an enemy contract is going to make?

Answer: Well, if your partner is a human, I'm afraid that I have no answer. However, if your "partner" is a GIBBO robot, the answer is "Whenever the piece of trash doubles it". In fact, whenever these clueless jerks double an enemy contract for penalties, consider yourself VERY lucky if it makes without overtricks.

[benellis58]

My contempt for the GIBBO robots grows every time I play a hand with them, every time I play a hand against them, every time I read about a hand involving them, and every time another player talks about them. The GIBBO robots not only disgust me - they disgust me more and more each and every day, as they continue to find new, innovative, and creative ways of even FURTHER humiliating themselves and even FURTHER exposing just how awesomely hopeless they are at every aspect of the game. They are indeed, and by far, the absolutely worst "bridge players" I have ever, EVER encountered in my many years of playing. They are far, FAR worse than even the worst human player I ever encountered. They are the worst of the worst, the lowest of the low. They are an embarrassment to the game of bridge.

Oh, and by the way, to be honest: I don't think they're very good. (Just thought I'd mention that, in case the first paragraph wasn't clear enough - ha, ha).

[benellis58]

Sorry. I'd just like to apologize for what I wrote in post #1486 immediately above.

It was far too...MILD....and far too...POLITE.

It didn't come CLOSE to expressing how much I detest the GIBBO robots. I'm truly sorry. In future, I'll try to be more clear in properly describing how much I loathe the nauseating, contemptible, unbearably stupid pieces of trash.