question
#4
Posted 2026-July-15, 06:32
#11
Posted Yesterday, 08:17
pescetom, on 2026-July-15, 06:32, said:
I think this really belongs in the advanced or expert forum.
My local club is full of intermediate players with a couple of players who were advanced in their heyday. I would be happy if they knew the continuations after RKCB (they don't) before they worried about void-showing responses, to which only some adv+ tournament players will have discussed with their regular partners.
In short, just within the topic of RKCB, there are more important areas to discuss.
#12
Posted Yesterday, 09:23
paulg, on 2026-July-16, 08:17, said:
I think this really belongs in the advanced or expert forum.
My local club is full of intermediate players with a couple of players who were advanced in their heyday. I would be happy if they knew the continuations after RKCB (they don't) before they worried about void-showing responses, to which only some adv+ tournament players will have discussed with their regular partners.
In short, just within the topic of RKCB, there are more important areas to discuss.
My local club is full of intermediate players with a couple of players who were advanced in their heyday. I would be happy if they knew the continuations after RKCB (they don't) before they worried about void-showing responses, to which only some adv+ tournament players will have discussed with their regular partners.
In short, just within the topic of RKCB, there are more important areas to discuss.
We actually don't play the standard responses with voids.
Most important question to ask is whether (spades trumps), 4N-5♣-5♦ is 5♥ or 5♠ denying the Q
#14
Posted Yesterday, 11:41
mike777, on 2026-July-16, 11:32, said:
I would definitely take 4NT as simple basic blackwood, how many aces.
5NT = 4
5C=0
Add my one ace and the KQ of hearts
Equals easy seven heart bid.
5NT = 4
5C=0
Add my one ace and the KQ of hearts
Equals easy seven heart bid.
In my simple, basic blackwood the 5NT response does not exist as I was taught that 5♣ is 0 or 4 aces.
As I said, there are simpler things to worry about
#15
Posted Yesterday, 12:21
paulg, on 2026-July-16, 11:41, said:
In my simple, basic blackwood the 5NT response does not exist as I was taught that 5♣ is 0 or 4 aces.
As I said, there are simpler things to worry about
As I said, there are simpler things to worry about
Well it existed with this partner,as well as 5 aces in our deck of cards, 5NT has to mean something, smile.
A much bigger concern is that our beginning declarer may have a panic attack trying to make seven or even six hearts and never come back to our club to be seen again. It happens...
How do we show the joy and excitement of bidding and making a slam and not make the beginning player feel that surgical staples are being removed from their skull.
.
#17
Posted Yesterday, 14:48
paulg, on 2026-July-16, 11:41, said:
In my simple, basic blackwood the 5NT response does not exist as I was taught that 5♣ is 0 or 4 aces.
As I said, there are simpler things to worry about
As I said, there are simpler things to worry about
I am a curious soul and learn mainly by searching internet (something increasingly difficult unless you are willing to accept pre-digested AI) and formulating my own conclusions.
These void showing responses to RKCB are documented and clear, although some like @thepossum find it repugnant that they effectively force to slam.
I'm not a fan of RKCB facing a hand that might be unbalanced in the first place, but if you must/will bid that way then they make sense IMHO.
What nobody documents are the follow-ups: I would expect cheapest step asking for void and next step asking for trumps Q with Specific King, although I would prefer the opposite.
#20
Posted Yesterday, 16:24
Just to reinforce my view that this should be in the expert forum ...
Adam Kaplan (current World Champion) and Owen Lien (pro) just had this auction in the round of 16 of the Spingold:
4NT was undiscussed and it was quantative to East and RKCB to West. West declined to show his void, presumably as he did not think he had extras.
Fortunately this made on a spade lead when the clubs broke and the diamond finesse worked. Declarer can make it on a non-spade lead with good guessing.
But if world-class players, who look like they'll be in the Spingold quarter-final tomorrow, struggle with 'simple' auctions ... I think most people will cope without void-showing responses.
Adam Kaplan (current World Champion) and Owen Lien (pro) just had this auction in the round of 16 of the Spingold:
4NT was undiscussed and it was quantative to East and RKCB to West. West declined to show his void, presumably as he did not think he had extras.
Fortunately this made on a spade lead when the clubs broke and the diamond finesse worked. Declarer can make it on a non-spade lead with good guessing.
But if world-class players, who look like they'll be in the Spingold quarter-final tomorrow, struggle with 'simple' auctions ... I think most people will cope without void-showing responses.

Help
Add Reply
MultiQuote