sceptic, on Dec 15 2006, 10:24 PM, said:
Quote
Pretty unusual, I think. The directors who appear to get thanked the most are the ones who are a bit obnoxious in tournament chat and who have tournament chat open to the players, I would guess because the more talkative players are encouraged to speak. It is not a net gain for those directors, because excessive tournament chat also tends to be annoying to many people. I think most people really do appreciate a well-run tournament, although they may not thank the director.
What an arrogant statement, I get thanked for running them ocasionally, the people that do that seem genuine and why the hell do all you experts assume that everyone who plays bridge wants to stick strictly to the rules
I announce that I am not a proffesional director and that most people playing are more qualified than me to make rulings, so do not expect any
and you know what, there is a huge demand for a quick no hassle fun tournement they are usually easy to direct and some times fun
I gather you are well respected as a TD, no idea why with your attitude, but then bridge does seem to suffer from a group of people that do their best and make decisions and another group of people that do nothing but critise and whinge, it would be interesting to do a poll and see where you saw yourself
Golfacer responded to the questions that Cascade asked in the original post. You however went completely off-topic and insulted golfacer. Do you actually read all the posts and try to understand what is going on before you respond, or is it normal for you to jump in head first? Why didn't you have a go at Cascade too.. Golfacer runs free tournaments and also spent a lot of time recently preparing a lecture in order to help TDs improve, yet all you can do is insult him? Where on earth are you coming from.