3NT, I'm going down...
Can you reach the best game? A difficult hand to bid in any system...
#21
Posted 2007-July-12, 04:00
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#22
Posted 2007-July-12, 04:30
I will be in 3NT in any system I've played.
I like to play this way as well. 2S for me, in addition, is NF and is a hand which would not accept an invitation to 3NT (though possibly would accept an invitation to 4S).
Peter
Quote
Shows extras, any rebid past 2♠ guarantees game values in our style
I like to play this way as well. 2S for me, in addition, is NF and is a hand which would not accept an invitation to 3NT (though possibly would accept an invitation to 4S).
Peter
#23
Posted 2007-July-12, 05:04
Maybe also for Free:
1♠: 13+ 5+♠ forcing
- 2♦: GF, 5+ cards
2♠: Minimum
- 3♥: Hearts (either slam interest or no ♣ stopper, otherwise bid 3NT)
4♦: No stopper, 3♦
- 4♠: Well I got Ax, maybe right contract
Pass: Okay
Can bhall please send me the notes to Minotaur? I'm interested
1♠: 13+ 5+♠ forcing
- 2♦: GF, 5+ cards
2♠: Minimum
- 3♥: Hearts (either slam interest or no ♣ stopper, otherwise bid 3NT)
4♦: No stopper, 3♦
- 4♠: Well I got Ax, maybe right contract
Pass: Okay
Can bhall please send me the notes to Minotaur? I'm interested
#24
Posted 2007-July-12, 06:27
In a weak NT system
1♠ 2♦
2NT 3♥
3♠ 4♠
is a possible auction.
But we might just raise 2NT to 3NT.
1♠ 2♦
2NT 3♥
3♠ 4♠
is a possible auction.
But we might just raise 2NT to 3NT.
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#25
Posted 2007-July-12, 07:30
I play one light 2/1 system and one FG 2/1 system. Neitehr of them particularly like opening 1NT with a 5-card major.
In one system we would probably bid
1S - 2D
2NT - 3NT (2NT = 15-19 balanced FG)
We could, if South judged to do so, bid
1S - 2D
2NT - 3C*
3H - 3S
4S
3C = enquiry
3H = 15-17, 3 diamonds, decent controls
3S = doubleton spade support, looking for the best game
4S = OK, sounds better than 3NT
...but I have a sneaky feeling we'd have the first auction
The 2/1 partnership would bid
1S - 1NT
2C* - 2NT
3NT
but at least we haven't highlighted the club lead
2C = balanced or clubs or decent hand with 6 spades
2NT = invitational without 5 hearts or 4+ clubs
if 2C is doubled we may have a rethink about the best game
In one system we would probably bid
1S - 2D
2NT - 3NT (2NT = 15-19 balanced FG)
We could, if South judged to do so, bid
1S - 2D
2NT - 3C*
3H - 3S
4S
3C = enquiry
3H = 15-17, 3 diamonds, decent controls
3S = doubleton spade support, looking for the best game
4S = OK, sounds better than 3NT
...but I have a sneaky feeling we'd have the first auction
The 2/1 partnership would bid
1S - 1NT
2C* - 2NT
3NT
but at least we haven't highlighted the club lead
2C = balanced or clubs or decent hand with 6 spades
2NT = invitational without 5 hearts or 4+ clubs
if 2C is doubled we may have a rethink about the best game
#27
Posted 2007-July-12, 15:42
I'm surprised nobody suggesed somethign like this:
EDIT: I was so surprised that reread the post and saw Mike had
, why don't you use the color suit symbols mike?
1♠-1NT*
2♦*-3♦
3♥-3♠
4♠
1NT forcing.
2♦ 3+
I might very well bid 3NT instead of 3♥ hard to not be biased, but rest of the bidding is clear in my 2/1 style.
EDIT: I was so surprised that reread the post and saw Mike had
1♠-1NT*
2♦*-3♦
3♥-3♠
4♠
1NT forcing.
2♦ 3+
I might very well bid 3NT instead of 3♥ hard to not be biased, but rest of the bidding is clear in my 2/1 style.
#28
Posted 2007-July-12, 15:58
Quote
In a weak NT system
1♠ 2D
2NT 3♥
3♠ 4♠
is a possible auction.
But we might just raise 2NT to 3NT.
1♠ 2D
2NT 3♥
3♠ 4♠
is a possible auction.
But we might just raise 2NT to 3NT.
I would certainly raise 2NT to 3NT.
Peter
#29
Posted 2007-July-15, 00:13
Gerben's sequence is perfect. For me, opener's second round 2♠ would be just a "mark time" bid, could have substantial extra strength but nothing more descriptive to say. I don't raise pard's 2♦ unless I have four of them.
AP
AP
#30
Posted 2007-July-15, 18:36
Fluffy, on Jul 12 2007, 04:42 PM, said:
I'm surprised nobody suggesed somethign like this:
1♠-1NT*
2♦*-3♦
3♥-3♠
4♠
1NT forcing.
2♦ 3+
1♠-1NT*
2♦*-3♦
3♥-3♠
4♠
1NT forcing.
2♦ 3+
I would also think that start seems reasonable.
1♠ natural 5+
1NT forcing
2♦ 3+
3♦ inviting
3♥ showing a ♥ stopper and no ♣ stopper
3♠ doubleton ♠, no ♣ stopper
At this point since responder is limited to invitational values, you could even pass 3♠ I suppose. Might be a reasonable choice at MPs.

Help
