Help
What's your call?
Page 1 of 1
After 4s Preemption
#1
- Group: Yellows
- Posts: 720
- Joined: 2004-January-06
- Location:CHINA
Posted 2008-January-27, 06:57
What's your call?
Michael Sun
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 2005-May-05
- Location:Oxford
- Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.
Posted 2008-January-27, 07:04
It's close to the border between a pass and a double.
I think I double.
I think I double.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,726
- Joined: 2006-June-05
- Location:Oslo, Norway
- Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy
Posted 2008-January-27, 07:31
I double, and I don't think it's close.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
#4
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Interests:bye
Posted 2008-January-27, 10:51
It's close to a redouble, if anything, but that's not really allowed.
I'd double without the ♥Q also (and replaced by a non spade)
I'd double without the ♥Q also (and replaced by a non spade)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,151
- Joined: 2003-June-11
- Location:Southern California
Posted 2008-January-27, 12:12
I'd pass and I don't think it's close.
If you double, what are you rooting for? A leave in or a pull? Neither looks that appetizing. The opps are vulnerable.
If you double, what are you rooting for? A leave in or a pull? Neither looks that appetizing. The opps are vulnerable.
"Phil" on BBO
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2008-January-27, 13:19
Dbl. I like action 
#7
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2008-January-27, 15:59
Double, not close.
Phil, partner is almost unlimited in this auction, only trouble about double is to fail on slam.
Phil, partner is almost unlimited in this auction, only trouble about double is to fail on slam.
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,290
- Joined: 2004-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, England
Posted 2008-January-27, 16:13
Double. You wouldn't have to change the hand much for me to pass.
#9 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-January-27, 17:12
X. As Phil implied this is going to give up 5 imps often (and maybe more with the overtrick). However you're going to get some small wins when you beat them 2 or a big win when partner bids a game and makes it or pushes them to the 5 level or w/e. I think doubling light here is a long term winner.
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2008-January-28, 05:00
Well, I don't even consider this a light dbl
#11
- Limit bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 8,482
- Joined: 2004-November-02
- Gender:Female
- Location:England
- Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those
Posted 2008-January-28, 05:45
Double. And I don't think this is light, just minimum.
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,251
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2008-January-28, 05:49
X.
Unless you play penalty doubles
in this position, in which case I
would pass, because I dont think
I am strong enough to force to
5 level via 4 NT in this case.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Unless you play penalty doubles
in this position, in which case I
would pass, because I dont think
I am strong enough to force to
5 level via 4 NT in this case.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,502
- Joined: 2007-December-22
Posted 2008-January-28, 07:17
Put me in with the 'Double, not close' crowd.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#14
- - - T98765432 AQT8
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,085
- Joined: 2005-June-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
Posted 2008-January-28, 09:51
I guess I'll start a new crowd. Double, but it's close.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,033
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2008-January-28, 10:19
I double.
Pass is too dangerous.
We are allowed to have the minimum hand for our call: it makes us dislike the call but that isn't a reason not to make it.
BTW, this would be a far more dangerous call if partner didn't have 4N available with a 2-suiter with which he can't pass 4♠ doubled.
Pass is too dangerous.
We are allowed to have the minimum hand for our call: it makes us dislike the call but that isn't a reason not to make it.
BTW, this would be a far more dangerous call if partner didn't have 4N available with a 2-suiter with which he can't pass 4♠ doubled.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#16
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,937
- Joined: 2004-June-05
Posted 2008-January-28, 11:35
mikeh, on Jan 28 2008, 11:19 AM, said:
BTW, this would be a far more dangerous call if partner didn't have 4N available with a 2-suiter with which he can't pass 4♠ doubled.
How so? Partner's expecting a three-suiter, yes? So if he has five diamonds and four clubs you'd expect him to say 5♦, not 4NT.
I'm not saying that Xing here for takeout is wrong (assuming you play it as takeout). I will say the average result from this has been nightmarish when I've been the partner, though often every choice is a bad result. But since partner didn't get a chance to bid over, say, 2♠, I don't see how I have any choice in the matter.
#17
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,351
- Joined: 2006-March-21
- Location:North Carolina
Posted 2008-January-28, 12:09
jtfanclub, on Jan 28 2008, 12:35 PM, said:
mikeh, on Jan 28 2008, 11:19 AM, said:
BTW, this would be a far more dangerous call if partner didn't have 4N available with a 2-suiter with which he can't pass 4♠ doubled.
How so? Partner's expecting a three-suiter, yes? So if he has five diamonds and four clubs you'd expect him to say 5♦, not 4NT.
You might, but I wouldn't.
If partner was 3-1-5-4 (or 2-2-5-4), he should bid 4N offering both minor suits, not a unilateral 5D.
jmoo.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#18
- 5555
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,519
- Joined: 2003-September-04
- Gender:Male
Posted 2008-January-28, 14:16
jtfanclub, on Jan 28 2008, 11:35 AM, said:
mikeh, on Jan 28 2008, 11:19 AM, said:
BTW, this would be a far more dangerous call if partner didn't have 4N available with a 2-suiter with which he can't pass 4♠ doubled.
How so? Partner's expecting a three-suiter, yes? So if he has five diamonds and four clubs you'd expect him to say 5♦, not 4NT.
I'm not saying that Xing here for takeout is wrong (assuming you play it as takeout). I will say the average result from this has been nightmarish when I've been the partner, though often every choice is a bad result. But since partner didn't get a chance to bid over, say, 2♠, I don't see how I have any choice in the matter.
I don't know what your partner's do, but when my partners have 3154 they either pass or bid 4N. It is not close to show 2 suits with this shape, since the takeout double could be off-shape (with 1426 and the right amount of high cards, I would double).
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
Page 1 of 1
(4♠)-ps-(ps)-?