I 'd actually like to focus on a more constrained issue:
In general, when I see discussion about "New Minor Forcing" it refers to a structure over a 1NT rebid, not a 1NT response
For example
1♦ - 1♠
1N - 2♣
is New Minor Forcing
1♠ - 1N
2♣
is a very different auction. I think that it would be a mistake to use the same expression to refer to both 2m bids.
Calling the second 2♣ bid New Minor Forcing is decided non-standard usage and is only going to confuse people.
How to continue 1S - 1NT - 2NT finding the 5-3 heart fit
#22
Posted 2008-February-07, 22:05
skaeran, on Feb 7 2008, 01:52 PM, said:
Do most people in the rest of the world play 2NT as 18-19 here?
In Norway it's standard among top players to play 2NT as a conventional GF. Not sure for how long, but it's probably like 15 years since I started playing that.
In Norway it's standard among top players to play 2NT as a conventional GF. Not sure for how long, but it's probably like 15 years since I started playing that.
Ditto here. But, if you do play it as 18-19 (actually, 17-18 probably), then...
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#23
Posted 2008-February-08, 03:51
Thanks for your responses.
I think i'll keep it simple and play 3♣/♦ non forcing and 3♥ forcing with 5 hearts, as suggested several times.
I think i'll keep it simple and play 3♣/♦ non forcing and 3♥ forcing with 5 hearts, as suggested several times.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)

Help
