how much do you trust your opponents?
#1
Posted 2008-February-26, 19:21
♥76
♦95
♣K9764
IMPS, Opponents vulnerable
W - N - E - S
ps-1♥-2♥-ps
2♠-4♣-4♠-??
East is good player, but junior.
#2
Posted 2008-February-26, 19:25
I trust everybody - partner, RHO, myself.
#4
Posted 2008-February-26, 19:29
#5
Posted 2008-February-26, 19:30
#6
Posted 2008-February-26, 19:32
- hrothgar
#7
Posted 2008-February-26, 19:54
#9
Posted 2008-February-26, 20:12
#10
Posted 2008-February-26, 21:00
we might get a one trick set ...
meanwhile we have a decent chance at game opposite as little as
♠ -
♥ AKxxx
♦ xxx
♣ AQxxx
The spade void might not be proven but partner rates to have more than this to offer the four-level opposite a passing partner.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#11
Posted 2008-February-27, 00:14
Cascade, on Feb 26 2008, 09:00 PM, said:
we might get a one trick set ...
meanwhile we have a decent chance at game opposite as little as
♠ -
♥ AKxxx
♦ xxx
♣ AQxxx
The spade void might not be proven but partner rates to have more than this to offer the four-level opposite a passing partner.
I nominate "rates to have" as the understatement of the year. 4♣ with this is crazy! I expect 6-5 or 6-6.
#12
Posted 2008-February-27, 03:07
han, on Feb 27 2008, 08:32 AM, said:
Ditto
#13
Posted 2008-February-27, 03:33
cherdano, on Feb 27 2008, 07:14 PM, said:
Cascade, on Feb 26 2008, 09:00 PM, said:
we might get a one trick set ...
meanwhile we have a decent chance at game opposite as little as
♠ -
♥ AKxxx
♦ xxx
♣ AQxxx
The spade void might not be proven but partner rates to have more than this to offer the four-level opposite a passing partner.
I nominate "rates to have" as the understatement of the year. 4♣ with this is crazy! I expect 6-5 or 6-6.
I am not suggesting 4♣ on this just illustrating that quite a weak hand will make game.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#14
Posted 2008-February-27, 04:50
han, on Feb 27 2008, 01:32 AM, said:
Right.
#15
Posted 2008-February-27, 06:12
if we trust'em (and that means 6-3 in trumps):
seems like we need 3 tempos to overtake trump control (the payoff would be hefty, 500-800, even when 5c fails) and that's unlikely to happen i'd go for 5c
however if i'm up against a player known for agressiveness (or even better foolishness) i would go for blood and lead club K
#17
Posted 2008-February-27, 13:01
Fluffy, on Feb 28 2008, 01:37 AM, said:
I though this was closer
What is the problem with this layout?
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#19
Posted 2008-February-27, 14:26
I have followed that advice and have never been disappointed.
This season i have not raised once and it was terribly wrong.
So 5♣ it is, also without the king(s).
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)

Help
