I doubled, your choice?
Page 1 of 1
After 3C preempt
#2
Posted 2008-March-02, 06:27
3NT for me.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#3
Posted 2008-March-02, 09:23
I think dbl has a couple of ways to lose. Prefer 3♦, which allows for a 3M rebid by pard, which we can either raise or bid 3NT over.
#4
Posted 2008-March-02, 09:59
I double also, I think ♠QJ is the doubleton holding most close to having 3 cards.
#5
Posted 2008-March-02, 10:47
3NT, seems obv to me.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#6
Posted 2008-March-02, 10:52
3NT.
Strangely, though, this is another good hand pattern for 3♦ as a Herbert Negative. You double. If partner bids 3♠, he has extras and justification therefore for a 3NT call. If he bids 3♥, you raise. If he bids 3♦, a relay, you can bid 3♥ and convert 3♠ to 3NT, but you might stop at 3♥, which might be a good thing. If partner has extras, he has less incentive to blast a "let's hope 4♠" call, resolving to 3♠ instead. Plus, I have little fear of a 4♦ call, but I would embrace it if it actually happened.
Strangely, though, this is another good hand pattern for 3♦ as a Herbert Negative. You double. If partner bids 3♠, he has extras and justification therefore for a 3NT call. If he bids 3♥, you raise. If he bids 3♦, a relay, you can bid 3♥ and convert 3♠ to 3NT, but you might stop at 3♥, which might be a good thing. If partner has extras, he has less incentive to blast a "let's hope 4♠" call, resolving to 3♠ instead. Plus, I have little fear of a 4♦ call, but I would embrace it if it actually happened.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2008-March-02, 11:59
3NT.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-02, 13:26
I don't understand why 3N would be better than X. Are people so worried about a 4S bid by pard on a 4 card suit that they would give up on getting to hearts/spades when they're right/staying lower/diamonds? I just don't think it occurs frequently enough to be worth it.
#9
Posted 2008-March-02, 15:08
I'd also double. As we play 3♦ as a Herbert negative here, partner will jump to 4♠ on a 4-card suit even less often than for most people.
Agree with Justin that the upside is so big that I'd rather double than overcall 3NT.
Agree with Justin that the upside is so big that I'd rather double than overcall 3NT.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
#11
Posted 2008-March-03, 06:31
I prefer 3♦ with this hand.
♠QJ is bad enough for 3NT to be an overbid, and since Dbl followed by 3NT over the likely 3♠ from partner shows a stronger hand, I can't bid that either.
Either of the 3 choices might be "best" on the actual hand.
♠QJ is bad enough for 3NT to be an overbid, and since Dbl followed by 3NT over the likely 3♠ from partner shows a stronger hand, I can't bid that either.
Either of the 3 choices might be "best" on the actual hand.
#12
Posted 2008-March-03, 09:28
I hate 3 NT, just one stopper,potential wrnogsiding contract, no source of tricks.
I go with 3 Diamond, I hear the stars say I should double and the reasons are convincing, but I am still unable to follow their view.
I go with 3 Diamond, I hear the stars say I should double and the reasons are convincing, but I am still unable to follow their view.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1

Help

(3♣)-?