BBO Discussion Forums: How do you bid this slam in 2/1 ? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How do you bid this slam in 2/1 ? BTW, should slam be bid at all? :)

#1 User is offline   Chamaco 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,908
  • Joined: 2003-December-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rimini-Bologna (Italy)
  • Interests:Chess, Bridge, Jazz, European Cinema, Motorbiking, Tango dancing

Posted 2004-June-19, 05:20

One hand from a team match yesterday on BBO.
We lost 11 imps for not bidding this slam, which was bid at the other table (I ignore the sequence they used).
Slam was made on a 2-2 trump split.

Scoring: IMP


At out table bidding went:

1:2*:2:3:4 all pass.
(* = game forcing)

I was North (the 1S opener), but I recognize the difficulty of my pard to investigate slam given many club losers, possible trumps losers, and not unlikely wasted values in spades from opener.

How would you bid the hand ?
Would you stretch for slam ?
"Bridge is like dance: technique's important but what really matters is not to step on partner's feet !"
0

#2 User is offline   bearmum 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 757
  • Joined: 2003-July-06
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 2004-June-19, 05:53

Chamaco, on Jun 20 2004, 12:20 AM, said:

One hand from a team match yesterday on BBO.
We lost 11 imps for not bidding this slam, which was bid at the other table (I ignore the sequence they used).
Slam was made on a 2-2 trump split.

Dealer: North
Vul: E/W
Scoring: IMP
AT643
85
J8
AK97
 
AJT6432
AKT
T53
 


At out table bidding went:

1:2*:2:3:4 all pass.
(* = game forcing)

I was North (the 1S opener), but I recognize the difficulty of my pard to investigate slam given many club losers, possible trumps losers, and not unlikely wasted values in spades from opener.

How would you bid the hand ?
Would you stretch for slam ?

First Q

I would have bid this at 2/1
1 2(game force) 3( DON'T have 6 s for rebid) 3 (like 6 s) 4 PASS

2nd Q

NO I don't think that slam should be considered -- ( but unfortunately LOTS of times folks BLAST to slam with insufficient values ( or without the means of finding out about contols etc) and find that because :P EVERYTHING is perfect :unsure: the slam rolls home :)
0

#3 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2004-June-19, 06:10

i think the bidding at your table was fine.. yeah the slam makes, but that's *this* time... it's a perfect fit
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2004-June-19, 06:26

Your bidding is perfect in my opinion, the slam is far from lucky, althou soem will know the exact %, I think the chances of 2-2 Or a bare honnor with 9 cards is around 72%.

If you need to blame someone blame yourself: you 'could' have bid 4 instead of 4, at this level this is a cue-bid with fit, not a new suit, but still you only got 11 HCP...
0

#5 User is offline   Chamaco 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,908
  • Joined: 2003-December-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rimini-Bologna (Italy)
  • Interests:Chess, Bridge, Jazz, European Cinema, Motorbiking, Tango dancing

Posted 2004-June-19, 07:06

bearmum, on Jun 19 2004, 11:53 AM, said:

I would have bid this at 2/1
1 2(game force) 3( DON'T have 6 s for rebid) 3 (like 6 s) 4 PASS

2nd Q

NO I don't think that slam should be considered -- ( but unfortunately LOTS of times folks BLAST to slam with insufficient values ( or without the means of finding out about contols etc) and find that because :P EVERYTHING is perfect :unsure: the slam rolls home :)

In the style of 2/1 I am playing (Lawrence / Gitelman), bidding 3 over pard's 2 shows extras, a hand near a reverse, either in hcp or distribution (say 5.5 losers).

In the same style, rebidding the major after pard's 2/1 is NOT showing eextra length, but simply a waiting bid, say to pard: I cannot bid NT, and have not the requirements to bid a new suit at the 3 level .

So 2 spades was the only bid left.... :(
"Bridge is like dance: technique's important but what really matters is not to step on partner's feet !"
0

#6 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2004-June-19, 09:01

Bidding is just right imo, and the slam is a bit lucky imo (also don't know the percentages)... You're missing KQ of trumps (which you can play wrong as well - do you cash the Ace, do you finesse 2 times, do you only finesse once,...?), and you don't know about the doubleton and A. If you don't have specific methods to find out about that, it's risky to go for slam imo.

Bidding 3 after the 2 GF shows extra's in most 2/1 systems, so I wouldn't advise that.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#7 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,082
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2004-June-19, 10:28

Fluffy, on Jun 19 2004, 01:26 PM, said:

Your bidding is perfect in my opinion, the slam is far from lucky, althou soem will know the exact %, I think the chances of 2-2 Or a bare honnor with 9 cards is around 72%.

If you need to blame someone blame yourself: you 'could' have bid 4 instead of 4, at this level this is a cue-bid with fit, not a new suit, but still you only got 11 HCP...


I think this is right.

Also I suspect that most of us have bigger problems in our game than bidding 24-point slams with a void in partner's main suit ;) ... so I wouldn't worry too much!

Paul
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#8 User is offline   mishovnbg 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 769
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:Bulgaria, Varna
  • Interests:Bridge - new bidding systems, psyches; Computers - education, service, program; Computer games great fan :-)

Posted 2004-June-22, 01:14

Hi Tiger!

1. Bids:
1-2
2-3
4-4
4-4NT
5-6

2. No ;)

Misho
MishoVnBg
0

#9 User is offline   joker_gib 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,384
  • Joined: 2004-February-16
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 2004-June-22, 04:46

Bidding was fine.

That slam is impossible to bid ! ;)
Alain
0

#10 User is offline   Trpltrbl 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,230
  • Joined: 2003-December-17
  • Location:Ohio
  • Interests:Sailing, cooking, bonsaitrees.

Posted 2004-June-27, 11:33

I think N bidding was fine, South should have bid 5 after 4.
71,22% Slam is good enough for me, takes a double finesse at worst.

Mike :D
“If there is dissatisfaction with the status quo, good. If there is ferment,
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.”
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users