BBO Discussion Forums: 1NT XX - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1NT XX When do you escape?

#1 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2009-September-30, 05:08

(1NT) X (XX) ?

XX = strong.

When do you run?

Is fourth seat expected to run with any weak hand?

Or only with a five-card suit?

Is doubler expected to run when he thinks it is unlikely that 1NT will be defeated opposite just a few points?
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#2 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-September-30, 06:41

Obviously somebody needs to run :lol:

But it doesn't have to be 4th seat. Pass would say, in effect, "I have no obvious choice of run out", handing the decision back to partner who may have a long suit. Therefore, I do think that a direct rescue by 4th seat should promise a 5 card suit.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2009-September-30, 09:57

Technically, given optimal bidding strategies from both sides 4th seat expected to run with a weak hand. Otherwise opps can make a psychic redouble, if passing means doubler has to run unless they have an extremely good hand. But practically, this probably isn't the case for most people's agreements.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#4 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2009-September-30, 10:35

I had this one recently

1NT* - p - p - x
p - p - xx - p
p - 2D

* weak

Is this D + a higher, since partner could have bid 2D over 1NTx with just a bunch of diamonds? Of course he doesn't know the redouble is coming.
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
0

#5 User is offline   quiddity 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2009-September-30, 12:08

Assuming penalty doubles of 1NT, I like the agreement that advancer must run with any weak hand and pass with values, and that a 2C bid is scrambling.
0

#6 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2009-September-30, 16:56

It probably depends on form of scoring too. As a psychic XX is more likely in BAM or MP than in IMPs.
0

#7 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,641
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2009-September-30, 17:02

I like the agreement that pass shows values, 2-2 are five card suits, and 2 shows clubs or any (semi)-balanced weak hand. If pass is forcing it allows the opponents to always escape by psyching the redouble (or if they psyched the original 1NT and actually have the redouble).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#8 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2009-September-30, 19:17

I would definitely have the agreement that passing a redouble is always for penalty unless discussed.

I have never discussed doing anything else here with any of my partners but it probably makes sense to believe the redoubler because it is such a dangerous psych. So, if you wanted to, you could have some kind of agreement such as bidding the lower of 2 suits and pass forcing 2 with a one suiter. In the absence of any agreement like that I don't see any advantage in playing pass as other than penalty.
0

#9 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2009-October-02, 04:18

If the redouble is genuine then 4th seat is known to have a very weak hand.

My agreement is to 'believe' the redouble; 4th seat always passes and the doubler pulls unless he has it off in his own hand (which can happen with a long suit).
0

#10 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,829
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-October-02, 04:50

FrancesHinden, on Oct 2 2009, 11:18 AM, said:

If the redouble is genuine then 4th seat is known to have a very weak hand.

My agreement is to 'believe' the redouble; 4th seat always passes and the doubler pulls unless he has it off in his own hand (which can happen with a long suit).

I think this is both simple and useful. Thanks.

What would you do in 4th seat when opps play Weak NT and 3rd seat passes to force a redouble. The bidding goes:
1NT (12-14) - X (pen) - Pass (alerted: forces a rdbl) - ???
XX (forced) - pass - Pass (business) - ???

Again, the 4th seat is known to have a very weak hand but is also the last to call if the 4th seat chose to pass in round 1. Any suggestions or comments?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users