In the thread Assign the Blame there was a raise of the 4th suit.
I have never been happy with responding to 4th suit when I have nothing to tell.
What are the standard responses when you have an awkward hand with nothing extra - typically 5422 5431 with no stopper in the fourth suit and singleton or doubleton support for partner.
Page 1 of 1
Responding to 4th Suit with Nothing to Tell
#1
Posted 2004-July-17, 17:01
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#2
Posted 2004-July-17, 21:49
i'm not sure bout this, i'll check my books, but i think g. rosenkrantz says to bid nt with a stopper in 4th suit, support pard's first with a doubleton honor, else rebid yours with 5
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#3
Posted 2004-July-17, 22:24
Here is what mishovnbg and I are playing...
Misho's method
Note, this link includes what to bid with nothing else to tell and with good stuff..
ben
Misho's method
Note, this link includes what to bid with nothing else to tell and with good stuff..
ben
--Ben--
#4
Posted 2004-July-18, 02:26
If your first suit is a 5-card while it might have been a 4-card, you do have something to tell.
Otherwise, here in the Netherlands there are two competing schools of thought. One says you should always lie about the length of a minor suit rather than about something else. Another says that you may repeat your second suit since your second suit is unlikelily to be a 5-card anyway. For example,
W E
1♦-1♥
1♠-2♣*
2♠
Here West does not show a 5-card spades since he would probably have opened 1♠ in that case. 2♠ is more likely to mean that he has nothing to tell. East can ask for clarification with 3♣ (I'm not sure if that is standard, that a repeat 4th suit is stil FSF). If you don't like the ambiguity of 2♠, you can agreee that West, with a 5-6, should have rebid spades with a jump either immediately or now, depending on his strength, or he should have opened 1♠.
Raising the 4th suit should not be a checkback-relay but should be natural, a 3-suited hand. However,
1♠-2♣
2♦-2♥*
3♥
In this case, West has 5341 without a heart stop since he would have rebid hearts with 5440. I think with 5242 without the A/K of hearts he would usually have bid 3♣ now, but maybe he could repeat spades with a very good suit.
Otherwise, here in the Netherlands there are two competing schools of thought. One says you should always lie about the length of a minor suit rather than about something else. Another says that you may repeat your second suit since your second suit is unlikelily to be a 5-card anyway. For example,
W E
1♦-1♥
1♠-2♣*
2♠
Here West does not show a 5-card spades since he would probably have opened 1♠ in that case. 2♠ is more likely to mean that he has nothing to tell. East can ask for clarification with 3♣ (I'm not sure if that is standard, that a repeat 4th suit is stil FSF). If you don't like the ambiguity of 2♠, you can agreee that West, with a 5-6, should have rebid spades with a jump either immediately or now, depending on his strength, or he should have opened 1♠.
Raising the 4th suit should not be a checkback-relay but should be natural, a 3-suited hand. However,
1♠-2♣
2♦-2♥*
3♥
In this case, West has 5341 without a heart stop since he would have rebid hearts with 5440. I think with 5242 without the A/K of hearts he would usually have bid 3♣ now, but maybe he could repeat spades with a very good suit.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#5
Posted 2004-July-18, 04:13
quite standard methods work well enough imo:
NT = stopper
repeat 2nd suit = 5 card 2nd suit
support p's suit = 3+ card
support 4th suit = 3+ card no stopper
repeat 1st bid suit = none of the above
repeating 1st or second suit can be swapped, because it depends if you already denied a 5 card (like a Major) or not.
Example:
1♠ - 2♣
2♦ - 2♥*
?
2NT = stopper
3♣ = 3+ card, so 5-1-4-3 or 5-0-4-4
3♦ = 5+♦ (usually doesn't have a stopper)
3♥ = 5-3-4-1, no stopper
2♠ = none of the above
3♠ = should be 6 card and maximum hand (otherwise no 2♦ bid)
NT = stopper
repeat 2nd suit = 5 card 2nd suit
support p's suit = 3+ card
support 4th suit = 3+ card no stopper
repeat 1st bid suit = none of the above
repeating 1st or second suit can be swapped, because it depends if you already denied a 5 card (like a Major) or not.
Example:
1♠ - 2♣
2♦ - 2♥*
?
2NT = stopper
3♣ = 3+ card, so 5-1-4-3 or 5-0-4-4
3♦ = 5+♦ (usually doesn't have a stopper)
3♥ = 5-3-4-1, no stopper
2♠ = none of the above
3♠ = should be 6 card and maximum hand (otherwise no 2♦ bid)
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#6
Posted 2004-July-18, 07:45
I think there is something to be said for first step response (excluding NT) includes the option of having nothing to say. There should be a subsequent enquiry method to clarify. It depends to some extent what is the minimum strength required of 4th suit. Some play it as GF, others not.
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees."Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#7
Posted 2004-July-18, 13:29
Here we play that rebiding the 5+ card suit may be 5 cards only, but before that there are 2 thing to consider:
If you have a doubleton honnor in partner´s suit you are wellcome to support it.
If your second suit its higher than first you then it MUST be a 4 carder, since with 5-6 you are suposed to open the highest suit, regardless of wich one is longer, therefore rebidding a suit with a known lenght can´t show anything else.
If you have a doubleton honnor in partner´s suit you are wellcome to support it.
If your second suit its higher than first you then it MUST be a 4 carder, since with 5-6 you are suposed to open the highest suit, regardless of wich one is longer, therefore rebidding a suit with a known lenght can´t show anything else.
#8
Posted 2004-July-19, 04:07
Yes, with a 2 card support it might turn out well to support. A few months ago, my p and I had a similar problem, I supported his ♥s on a 2 card, and my p bid 4♥ with only 4, since he knew 3NT was impossible and thought the moysian would be more successful. Tnx to a wonderful lead, we made +2
instead of -1.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
Page 1 of 1

Help
