Another lead Problem
#2
Posted 2010-August-25, 10:19
#3
Posted 2010-August-25, 10:20
Clearly the danger is are you giving the opps their ninth trick with a ♠ lead. The red card choices clearly believe you do and struggle to find an entry to partner's hand and hope that partner's ♠ return is enough to break the hand. Finally a ♣ lead hopes that declarer will be forced to put our partner on lead before he collects his 9th trick.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2010-August-25, 12:06
I think it's close between diamond and heart.
Diamond looks more natural so I lead diamonds.
I think leading spade gives 9th trick too often.
#5
Posted 2010-August-25, 12:21
Even if you lead a diamond and find partner with the ace, that may well give the contract - they might have six clubs and ♥A on top, plus some diamonds after the lead.
#6
Posted 2010-August-25, 13:05
Leading an offsuit assumes they need the ♠K as the 9th trick, and that partner can effectively lead through declarer once or twice, which needs a spade holding strong enough like Txx when declarer holds Kxx or T9x when declarer holds Kxxx.
As far the Q versus a spot, I doubt it makes a lot of difference, although I think on balance the Q makes our life easier.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2010-August-25, 13:33
#8
Posted 2010-August-25, 13:39
JLOGIC, on Aug 25 2010, 08:33 PM, said:
Or we might need to use partner's ♠10 to avoid an endplay.
#9
Posted 2010-August-25, 14:22
#10
Posted 2010-August-25, 14:25
And I am not sure why the double of 2S denies being something like Kxxx AJxx Axx xx? (Apollo81's point)
#11
Posted 2010-August-25, 14:41
Apollo81, on Aug 25 2010, 03:22 PM, said:
Huh? If he had a 3N bid with 4 hearts he would almost always double I think.
#12
Posted 2010-August-25, 14:42
lamford, on Aug 25 2010, 03:25 PM, said:
How have you gained by leading low vs the queen in this scenario??
#14
Posted 2010-August-28, 19:47
#15
Posted 2010-August-29, 08:39
#16
Posted 2010-August-29, 15:15
JLOGIC, on Aug 25 2010, 03:42 PM, said:
lamford, on Aug 25 2010, 03:25 PM, said:
How have you gained by leading low vs the queen in this scenario??
Mea culpa; I did not notice that I had the seven of spades, so was worried about declarer having K107x, when I think you need to lead low. On the actual hand I would now lead the queen.
#17
Posted 2010-August-30, 04:12
#18
Posted 2010-August-30, 15:57
JLOGIC, on Aug 25 2010, 03:42 PM, said:
lamford, on Aug 25 2010, 03:25 PM, said:
How have you gained by leading low vs the queen in this scenario??
Opponents have to gather their trick in spades immediately with low spade lead or face partner leading through the spades rather than duck the lead with a Q♠lead although the Q does show the dummy and hopefully the next lead.

Help

1♠-(2♣)-2♠-(Dbl)
P-(3♣)-P-(3NT)
All Pass