Hand Evaluation what to bid?
#1
Posted 2010-September-29, 22:44
AJ2, KQ, KQJ, QT652
What do you bid?
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#2
Posted 2010-September-29, 22:59
BunnyGo, on Sep 29 2010, 11:44 PM, said:
AJ2, KQ, KQJ, QT652
What do you bid?
assuming g=beginner forum...easy
1nt 16-`18
#3
Posted 2010-September-29, 23:01
mike777, on Sep 29 2010, 11:59 PM, said:
BunnyGo, on Sep 29 2010, 11:44 PM, said:
AJ2, KQ, KQJ, QT652
What do you bid?
assuming g=beginner forum...easy
1nt 16-`18
No, decent players using a 15-17 NT range...it may be worth bidding 1NT anyways.
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#4
Posted 2010-September-29, 23:16
BunnyGo, on Sep 30 2010, 12:01 AM, said:
This is matter of style. If you routinely open 1NT with good 14 HCP hands, then this hand is too good for 1NT. If you never open 1NT with 14 count, then you can certainly consider 1NT here in MP.
#5
Posted 2010-September-29, 23:20
#6
Posted 2010-September-29, 23:32
#7
Posted 2010-September-29, 23:57
CSGibson, on Sep 30 2010, 12:32 AM, said:
OP understands that 1♣ followed by 2N shows 18-19 so I find this rather unhelpful.
Tough hand. Sure KQ and KQJ aren't pulling their full weight, but I've got a 5-card suit too. Move a jack into the club suit and I think a 2N rebid strategy is 100% clear so this doesn't seem so far off that I should downgrade to a 1N opener.
#8
Posted 2010-September-30, 01:11
#9
Posted 2010-September-30, 02:07
kfay, on Sep 29 2010, 10:57 PM, said:
CSGibson, on Sep 30 2010, 12:32 AM, said:
OP understands that 1♣ followed by 2N shows 18-19 so I find this rather unhelpful.
Tough hand. Sure KQ and KQJ aren't pulling their full weight, but I've got a 5-card suit too. Move a jack into the club suit and I think a 2N rebid strategy is 100% clear so this doesn't seem so far off that I should downgrade to a 1N opener.
Fair enough. I should have probably read into the thread title that the OP was looking for more than the basics.
For the record, I agree with your assessment as to the hand, it's just good enough that I wouldn't downgrade, personally, but I wouldn't think it a clear error if someone did decide to downgrade.
#10
Posted 2010-September-30, 03:13
#11
Posted 2010-September-30, 07:01
655321, on Sep 30 2010, 12:20 AM, said:
I'm happy to read this. I assumed every player better than me was going to bid 1NT.
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#12
Posted 2010-September-30, 08:36
nigel_k, on Sep 30 2010, 07:11 AM, said:
This!
#13
Posted 2010-September-30, 08:50
655321, on Sep 30 2010, 12:20 AM, said:
me 2
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#14
Posted 2010-September-30, 09:18
#15
Posted 2010-September-30, 09:39
#16
Posted 2010-September-30, 09:49
#17
Posted 2010-September-30, 09:53
nigel_k, on Sep 30 2010, 02:11 AM, said:
I strongly disagree. And I don't mean that as an insult to B/I players, I mean it as a compliment to anyone who knows what KQ and KQJ are worth since they are better than B/I IMO (at least better than B for sure).
#18
Posted 2010-September-30, 10:02
TylerE, on Sep 30 2010, 10:18 AM, said:
Let me know when you have one and we will discuss it
Serisouly, I don't really care on this one either way, whichever my partner chooses would be fine with me. Personally I lean to the aggressive side so I would open 1♣ and rebid 2NT. But it doesn't feel like a very important distinction.
-gwnn
#19
Posted 2010-September-30, 10:05
#20
Posted 2010-September-30, 10:14
TylerE, on Sep 30 2010, 09:05 AM, said:
provably lol

Help
