Gallup Poll
#1
Posted 2010-November-15, 03:19
3♠:3N
4N
#2
Posted 2010-November-15, 04:16
Since responder is limited to 11-12 a quantitative 4NT makes no sense at all.
Since no suit is set ace ask would be blatant nonsense.
With the give options quantitative seems a little less unlikely.
#3
Posted 2010-November-15, 05:33
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2010-November-15, 05:42
#5
Posted 2010-November-15, 06:08
helene_t, on 2010-November-15, 05:42, said:
♠ AKQxx ♥ x ♦ A ♣ AQJTxx
♠ KQJx ♥ AK ♦ x ♣ KQJT9x
#6
Posted 2010-November-15, 08:07
#7
Posted 2010-November-15, 08:22
#8
Posted 2010-November-15, 10:57
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#9
Posted 2010-November-15, 11:46
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2010-November-15, 12:31
gwnn, on 2010-November-15, 11:46, said:
That's easy
♠AKT98
♥AQT
♦AT9
♣AT
is 6NT and
♠KQJ
♥KQJ2
♦KQJ
♣Q32
is pass
that is the difference between having 20 or 21 and 11 or 12
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#11
Posted 2010-November-15, 13:18
♥ A98
♦ AT98
♣ T98
is 6NT and
♠ QJ2
♥ QJ2
♦ QJ32
♣ Q32
is a pass. WTP?
#12
Posted 2010-November-15, 13:27
what do you play 2N-p-4N as.
I don't see an answer.
George Carlin
#13
Posted 2010-November-15, 15:17
gwnn, on 2010-November-15, 11:46, said:
Just like Gerber, it never comes up. We have found a better use for 4♣, but we don't need 4NT for something else. As a result we still play it as quant.
Note: we open good 19 to bad 21. Technically speaking it's a 2-point range, but in practice it's a 3-point range.
#14
Posted 2010-November-15, 21:17
I believe partner is trying to reach 6c and is asking us if our hand fits clubs and spades well
A good example hand might be AKxx Ax x AKxxxx
slam is pretty awful opposite xxx QJx KQxx QJx
while a grand is great opposite Qx Kxx AJxx Jxxx
#15
Posted 2010-November-16, 01:00
Quatitative.
With 6-5 p can bid 4S, with 7/6-4 he can bid 4C.
And there good control rich 12HCPs and there are bad control poor
11HCP counts, so quatitative will answer your question, and p will
valuate black honors higher.
We can still play 6C, with a hand better suited for clubs p should
bid 5C, if he declines and 6C, if he accepts.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#16
Posted 2010-November-16, 09:54
Obv.
lol.
- hrothgar
#18
Posted 2010-November-16, 10:02
Quote
x2
- hrothgar
#19
Posted 2010-November-16, 10:14
I intended 4N as quantitative but knew there was a risk that it would be misunderstood. It could have been smarter to pass 3N
1♣:2N
3♠ - if I have a 2 suiter, why is this better as shortage and not the second suit?
#20
Posted 2010-November-16, 10:20
jillybean, on 2010-November-16, 10:14, said:
3♠ - if I have a 2 suiter, why is this better as shortage and not the second suit?
A common problem hand is 4M6♣, not sure whether to play 3NT or 5♣, maybe 6♣. It is then useful for responder to know about the singleton, with a double guard opposite the singleton it is 3NT.
5M6♣ is not so common and besides, with those hands you don't want to play 3NT anyway so you can afford to bypass 3NT when describing your hand.