Opening bid?
#2
Posted 2011-June-05, 22:47
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#3
Posted 2011-June-05, 23:03
#5
Posted 2011-June-05, 23:44
In the end this is more a style thing, than anything else.
If you play "strong" reverses, than the hand is min for a reverse,
and this would be a reason to open 1NT.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2011-June-06, 01:13
#8
Posted 2011-June-06, 07:08
whereagles, on 2011-June-06, 05:40, said:
♥
I find this hand really to weak for a reverse... but I guess it depends on partnership methods....
#9
Posted 2011-June-06, 07:15
Opening 1♦ has many rebidding problems imo: we don't have a good suit to rebid 2♦, we are quite weak and have poor honour location for a light reverse, and 1NT is quite an underbid.
#10
Posted 2011-June-06, 09:54
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2011-June-06, 10:58
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#13
Posted 2011-June-07, 01:20
If partner responds 1♠, my plan is to rebid 2♥. To suggest a hand for partner in support of 1♦, I offer ♠Axxx ♥x ♦K10xx ♣Kxxx. To justify their superior numbers, I humbly challenge the crowd of 1NT openers to produce at least three hands for partner where the 1NT opening bid will win. GO!
#14
Posted 2011-June-07, 07:35
Foxx, on 2011-June-07, 01:20, said:
If partner responds 1♠, my plan is to rebid 2♥. To suggest a hand for partner in support of 1♦, I offer ♠Axxx ♥x ♦K10xx ♣Kxxx. To justify their superior numbers, I humbly challenge the crowd of 1NT openers to produce at least three hands for partner where the 1NT opening bid will win. GO!
When my partner shows a GF 4=1=4=4, I'll definitely bid 4♦ and slam bidding can start. I'm not saying we'll reach slam, but the chances exist.
On the other hand, after opening 1♦ and reversing, partner won't like his singleton ♥ and might just signoff in 3NT...
#15
Posted 2011-June-07, 07:52
Free, on 2011-June-06, 07:15, said: