What say you? 2D was both majors...
Annoying Michaels
#2
Posted 2011-September-05, 16:07
-- Bertrand Russell
#3
Posted 2011-September-05, 16:09
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#4
Posted 2011-September-05, 16:32
#5
Posted 2011-September-05, 16:55
It is possible that we will make their lead decision easier by going slower but I don't think that warrants masterminding it at such an early stage in the auction when we know very little.
#6
Posted 2011-September-05, 17:24
2S! ( Un-Un ) = limit+ raise for Diam
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#7
Posted 2011-September-05, 18:17
#8
Posted 2011-September-05, 18:32
Siegmund, on 2011-September-05, 18:17, said:
It would not be surprising if partner had one honor in both majors. That said, what is the downside of bidding 2S (or whatever your methods), and seeing if partner has a 2N bid? I don't understand the rush to bid 3N, we have a fine hand for a diamond slam, and a fine hand for partner to bid NT IF he wants to. Of course, if partner doesn't want to bid NT, it might be right to play from our side, imagine LHO with Hxx of hearts and RHO with HT9xx.
#9
Posted 2011-September-05, 18:54
I'm just not seeing the big upside to going slow either. Partner is allowed to bid over 3NT if he thinks slam is a possibility opposite a 4333 13-15 pointer, too. Put another way, what had DOES bid an immediate 3NT if 4333 13-15 pointers don't? OK, my 15 points could have all been in kings and queens rather than having, especially, the HA.
I have no big complaint with 2S. I just am happy to get my whole hand off my chest in one bid. (And one time I WILL be better placed is if LHO chooses 4M next - p knows I have a trump trick to aid him in the 5m/6m vs X decision, and will have a forcing pass available that he might not if it goes 2S(limit+)-4M. )
#10
Posted 2011-September-05, 19:21
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#11
Posted 2011-September-05, 21:42
Phil, on 2011-September-05, 19:21, said:
no, but you can show a limit+ for diamonds and see where the thing is going. Doesn't really matter, I don't think whether you can show everything all at once.
#12
Posted 2011-September-05, 22:13
aguahombre, on 2011-September-05, 21:42, said:
I can show major stoppers and I can show a splinter in a major.
How do I show a diamond raise?
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#13
Posted 2011-September-05, 22:41
#14
Posted 2011-September-05, 22:49
Phil, on 2011-September-05, 22:13, said:
How do I show a diamond raise?
As Arty said, 2♠, u still have room for stoppers at 3 level.
The way we play it, 3♦ weak hands, 2♠ gf ♦ hands, DBL invitation hands or will make penalty dbl.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#15
Posted 2011-September-06, 01:33
Phil, on 2011-September-05, 22:13, said:
How do I show a diamond raise?
Prioritizing your 2 cuebids as showing a stopper and saying nothing about suit lengths seems extremely bizarre for your first bid of the auction. It is easy to see how if the opponents bid at all you will be in trouble. Even if they pass, it's easy to see this approach not working out.
#16
Posted 2011-September-06, 04:30
#17
Posted 2011-September-06, 05:01
Fluffy, on 2011-September-06, 04:30, said:
It means you can't make a non-forcing bid in clubs (unless you're using 2NT for that?)
With double, 2♥, 2♠, 2NT, 3♣ and 3♦ available, it ought to be possible to show all the hands you want.
#18
Posted 2011-September-06, 08:59
We are red, they are green, we need to beat 2M -4, so that we have a profit.
Try to teach them, that they revealed to much.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#19
Posted 2011-September-06, 10:21
Fluffy, on 2011-September-06, 04:30, said:
gnasher, on 2011-September-06, 05:01, said:
With double, 2♥, 2♠, 2NT, 3♣ and 3♦ available, it ought to be possible to show all the hands you want.
I think you two are both right on, and the two posts complement each other to clarify the whole structure. However, I took the liberty of changing a word in Gnasher's to distinguish between 3C and 2NT. The players could choose which is invite and which is drop-dead.
#20
Posted 2011-September-06, 13:34
gnasher, on 2011-September-06, 05:01, said:
With double, 2♥, 2♠, 2NT, 3♣ and 3♦ available, it ought to be possible to show all the hands you want.
Here are the hand types I would like to show with those actions:
- interest in penalising
- clubs non-forcing (constructive)
- clubs forcing
- game forcing diamond raise
- limit diamond raise
- weak diamond raise
- fit bid in clubs
That's 7 hand types and 6 calls, so I still can't quite do it.
[I combine limit in diamonds and FG in diamonds in the standard way to use 2S as limit+, but I'm not convinced that's totally ideal; there's something to be said for giving up the club semi-fit bid (3-5 or 4-5, which we use 2NT for) in favour of showing FG values at once when partner has opened a minor]