P or keep bidding?
		
	Page 1 of 1
			
	
Have you done enough already? JEC #10, hand 10
				
						#2
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-19, 15:40
						Abstain, I wouldn't bid 1♥.
						
						
						
					
					
						
	"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
					
				-- Bertrand Russell
				
						#4
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-20, 01:20
						Interestingly enough, at both tables the auction was identical to this point (at least the calls were the same, not sure if the inferences or meanings of 1♥ and 1♠ are necessarily identical).
						
						
						
					
					
				
				
						#6
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-20, 09:54
						1h perfectly reasonable wasting space with a reverse makes little
sense save it for hands where it is needed. P heard our bidding
and while we indeed have 8 probable tricks we woud need 4 from p
for slam. Surely if p had something like 4 probable tricks they
could have found a bid other than a simple 3n. If p has no spade
stop after this bidding find another p.
pass
						
					
					
				sense save it for hands where it is needed. P heard our bidding
and while we indeed have 8 probable tricks we woud need 4 from p
for slam. Surely if p had something like 4 probable tricks they
could have found a bid other than a simple 3n. If p has no spade
stop after this bidding find another p.
pass
				
						#7
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-21, 03:38
						I would always bid 1 Heart, even if walsh was a part of my system, I need all the space aI have and I want my jumpshifts to be of full value, not just of full shape.
Now I pass.
						
					
					
						Now I pass.
	Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
					
				Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
				
						#8
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-21, 14:21
						I would bid 1♥ also.  A jump to 2♥ is not a reverse, it is a jump shift -- or if you prefer, a jump reverse. Either way, for me, a jump to 2♥ would be game forcing whereas, a simple reverse is only forcing, not game forcing.  As the 1♥ bidder, bidding again over 3NT is a close decision, with two ways to go. 4♣'s to show really strong clubs, or 4NT to invite six.  Of course, pass is (at least in my opinion) a reasonable option over 3NT as well.
  A jump to 2♥ is not a reverse, it is a jump shift -- or if you prefer, a jump reverse. Either way, for me, a jump to 2♥ would be game forcing whereas, a simple reverse is only forcing, not game forcing.  As the 1♥ bidder, bidding again over 3NT is a close decision, with two ways to go. 4♣'s to show really strong clubs, or 4NT to invite six.  Of course, pass is (at least in my opinion) a reasonable option over 3NT as well.
						
						
						
					
					
						 A jump to 2♥ is not a reverse, it is a jump shift -- or if you prefer, a jump reverse. Either way, for me, a jump to 2♥ would be game forcing whereas, a simple reverse is only forcing, not game forcing.  As the 1♥ bidder, bidding again over 3NT is a close decision, with two ways to go. 4♣'s to show really strong clubs, or 4NT to invite six.  Of course, pass is (at least in my opinion) a reasonable option over 3NT as well.
  A jump to 2♥ is not a reverse, it is a jump shift -- or if you prefer, a jump reverse. Either way, for me, a jump to 2♥ would be game forcing whereas, a simple reverse is only forcing, not game forcing.  As the 1♥ bidder, bidding again over 3NT is a close decision, with two ways to go. 4♣'s to show really strong clubs, or 4NT to invite six.  Of course, pass is (at least in my opinion) a reasonable option over 3NT as well.
						
						
	--Ben--
					
				
				
						#9
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-21, 14:41
						btw it seemed opener was playing walsh style but not sure responder was.
1c=1s
2h=?
sets up a different dynamic.
						
					
					
				1c=1s
2h=?
sets up a different dynamic.
				
						#11
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-21, 17:42
						ya only gf and never up the line with only 4-4....
so 1d then 1s would be nat, gf with 5-4
but sure other versions of walsh
						
					
					
				so 1d then 1s would be nat, gf with 5-4
but sure other versions of walsh
				
						#12
						
								 
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2012-May-23, 03:27
						I don't know why you would bid only 1H here. It seems useful to show a GF hand when you hold one.
						
						
						
					
					
						
	Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1. 
- hrothgar
					
				- hrothgar
	
	Page 1 of 1
	
	

 Help
 Help

