Help
Playing teams, do you agree with N/S bidding?
Page 1 of 1
Is that it? Or can we do something?
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,082
- Joined: 2006-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santiago, Chile
- Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.
Posted 2012-June-12, 11:21
Playing teams, do you agree with N/S bidding?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 729
- Joined: 2010-August-03
Posted 2012-June-12, 11:31
Ouch. I would duplicate this auction.
Videos of the worst bridge player ever playing bridge:
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
#3
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-June-12, 13:20
South had automatic X. From there I would expect 4N-5C-5D-5H-p
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#4
- Under bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,797
- Joined: 2004-July-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posted 2012-June-13, 08:55
Ditto.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#5
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2012-June-13, 09:55
North needs South to have about four of five cover cards, as the short spade is obvious. That means that he needs three covers and a void or four covers.
South's 5♣ call is the sole reason why North probably loses ambition. Had South bid 5♦ to preference a red suit, North is good enough, IMO, to venture to slam.
South perhaps should smell this potential and take some creative risk.
Thus, in a serious example of post-mortem influenced heavily by seeing both hands, I would still argue that a theoretically sound auction might be:
X-4NT
5♦-5NT
6♥
South's 5♣ call is the sole reason why North probably loses ambition. Had South bid 5♦ to preference a red suit, North is good enough, IMO, to venture to slam.
South perhaps should smell this potential and take some creative risk.
Thus, in a serious example of post-mortem influenced heavily by seeing both hands, I would still argue that a theoretically sound auction might be:
X-4NT
5♦-5NT
6♥
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,952
- Joined: 2008-June-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-June-13, 10:06
South has to double 4♠. The chances of them stealing vs bidding to make are very high and -590 (or even -690) isn't the end of the world.
In my partnership -5 imps is the playing around range and you can't pull this double without an expectation of going plus.
It's not at all clear if we would find the slam, in fact probably not unless we get a 5♠ bid and a forcing pass opportunity.
In my partnership -5 imps is the playing around range and you can't pull this double without an expectation of going plus.
It's not at all clear if we would find the slam, in fact probably not unless we get a 5♠ bid and a forcing pass opportunity.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,660
- Joined: 2011-February-12
Posted 2012-June-13, 10:19
JLOGIC, on 2012-June-12, 13:20, said:
South had automatic X. From there I would expect 4N-5C-5D-5H-p
exactamundo
neither side really has the stuff to push to slam preempts work do the
best you can
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,066
- Joined: 2012-March-06
Posted 2012-June-13, 10:21
I don't care about missing this slam, it's not like I would have automatically bid it if I had opened the bidding either.
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
- billw55
Page 1 of 1