2/1, standardish agreements. Tasty.
Cookie! Om nom nom
#1
Posted 2012-October-08, 06:53
2/1, standardish agreements. Tasty.
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#2
Posted 2012-October-08, 08:20
-gwnn
#3
Posted 2012-October-08, 08:42
Now you can bid X or 1 ♠ to show the spades and the other bid to show a hand with no clear direction.
Another possibility is to bid 1 NT without a stopper and if they take the first 5 tricks, claim the rest.
if partner has extras, he shall ask you about the stopper on the way to 3 NT- but this is a worse agreement, it simply wrongsides some games.
Without these tools, I would pass with a big sigh to make sure that partner knows that I have a problem hand.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2012-October-08, 08:43
#5
Posted 2012-October-08, 08:46
Codo, on 2012-October-08, 08:42, said:
Now you can bid X or 1 ♠ to show the spades and the other bid to show a hand with no clear direction.
Another possibility is to bid 1 NT without a stopper and if they take the first 5 tricks, claim the rest.
if partner has extras, he shall ask you about the stopper on the way to 3 NT- but this is a worse agreement, it simply wrongsides some games.
Without these tools, I would pass with a big sigh to make sure that partner knows that I have a problem hand.
Second.
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#6
Posted 2012-October-08, 08:48
#7
Posted 2012-October-08, 08:51
On the other hand, if 1♥ passes back to partner and he cannot reopen, I don't think we have lost much. (Form of scoring could make a big difference.)
-gwnn
#8
Posted 2012-October-08, 13:46
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#9
Posted 2012-October-08, 13:48
I'm ready to be wrong, but I don't see what else it could be.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#10
Posted 2012-October-08, 14:54
#11
Posted 2012-October-08, 15:33
655321, on 2012-October-08, 14:54, said:
I was going to bid 2C but I saw a unanimous vote for pass and I was too scared to vote. Now 655321 has bid 2C and I look like I'm parroting.
Bye 50.
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
#12
Posted 2012-October-08, 16:12
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#13
Posted 2012-October-08, 16:26
#14
Posted 2012-October-08, 17:19
Codo has it right. I would pass without that agreement but would at least consider 2♣.
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#15
Posted 2012-October-08, 18:24
#16
Posted 2012-October-08, 18:31
- billw55
#17
Posted 2012-October-08, 18:44
OK that's a reach but the hand definitely does not belong to us until further notice and I'm not sending that message to pard who would be full value to compete too high or/and then double something we can't beat.
What is baby oil made of?