BBO Discussion Forums: Balanced? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Balanced?

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2012-October-08, 11:32

It's not clear to me what should be different, but the North hand definitely doesn't match the description of the 1NT bid.
0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-October-08, 12:51

I played some hands over the weekend in which (1) GIB CHO passed my 3NT call with seven spades in an auction where CHO bid spades one time, and (2) GIB CHO let me play in 3NT having 6-6 distribution! The funny thing about the second one was that 3NT turned out to be the winning spot, since I had AKJ in his 6 card minor.
0

#3 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2012-October-08, 18:00

View PostBbradley62, on 2012-October-08, 11:32, said:

It's not clear to me what should be different, but the North hand definitely doesn't match the description of the 1NT bid.

It should be allowed to bid 3 which is weaker than 2 on such hands. If it was weaker still, it should be allowed to bid 1NT which merely says 3-Clubs, 3-Spades, 4+Hearts 6-9HCP. A lot of descriptions are way too descriptive (restrictive).
0

#4 User is offline   CarlRitner 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 211
  • Joined: 2005-July-14

Posted 2012-October-08, 18:12

1C - 1D;
1S - 2D; looks sensible. Walsh can be ignored with this sort of shape.
Cheers,
Carl
0

#5 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2012-October-08, 21:47

View PostCarlRitner, on 2012-October-08, 18:12, said:

1C - 1D;
1S - 2D; looks sensible. Walsh can be ignored with this sort of shape.

Unfortunately they will never program that in as its too specific.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users