BBO Discussion Forums: Hand evaluation and auction planning in Polish club - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Hand evaluation and auction planning in Polish club

#1 User is offline   antonylee 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 499
  • Joined: 2011-January-19
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-November-20, 16:14

You pick up KQx KQJxx AQxxx -, first seat all white, imps. You are playing WJ05 with Bubrotka. Do you open 1 (18+ or various weaker hands, you will be GF'ed when partner had any 7+) or 1 (11-17)?
If you open 1, partner bids 1 (7+, 4+). Do you bid 2 (18+, 3+, artificially asks partner's 1/ length and 2/ strength (7-10 or 11+)) or 2 (natural bidding after that but partner will initially assume you have at most 2 except if very unbalanced)?
0

#2 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-November-20, 16:23

I would open 1 , but it is close. The hand is strong enough, but I can anticipate some ugly situations with two suiters over a 1 Club opening.

Over 1 I would rebid 2 , if partner will rebid 2 , I try a forcing spade raise- is 4 avaiable, over other bids, I show my diamonds or my spades, ddepends on partners bid.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#3 User is offline   antonylee 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 499
  • Joined: 2011-January-19
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-November-20, 16:46

In that case the auction will likely go 1 1 2 2N 3 3N (2N, 3N: naturalish).
Did you have enough, or are you going to try something else?
If partner rebid 2 then even 3 would be forcing so you'd be in a decent position.
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-November-20, 17:06

I would bid 4 and pass any passable bid thereafter...
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   antonylee 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 499
  • Joined: 2011-January-19
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-November-20, 17:32

So you'd give up on finding 4 on a 4-3 fit (not that it's totally obvious there's any hand where 4 makes and neither 4 nor 5 does)?
Anyways I had the following auction: 1 1 2 (art GF 3+) 2 (4 exactly, 7-10) 3 3N 4, partner had xxxx Tx xxx AKxx and made when broke 3-3 and a misdefense provided him with the entry to hook the . Not very convincing...
0

#6 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-November-21, 02:59

Yes I would give up on spades, mybe wrongly so, but I would find the 5-2 heart or the 5-3 diamond fit.
I guess I had played 4 , not a piece of cake, but if they lead the unbid suit, I just need the diamond finesse and diamonds 3-2. Oh well. We are minimum for 1 , partner minimum for 1 and you can hardly find 7 points which are worse then what he holds....
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users